Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 1):1614-29.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01158.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment

Affiliations

Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment

Justin B Dimick et al. Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: We examined the implications of reliability adjustment on hospital mortality with surgery.

Data source: We used national Medicare data (2003-2006) for three surgical procedures: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, and pancreatic resection.

Study design: We conducted an observational study to evaluate the impact of reliability adjustment on hospital mortality rankings. Using hierarchical modeling, we adjusted hospital mortality for reliability using empirical Bayes techniques. We assessed the implication of this adjustment on the apparent variation across hospitals and the ability of historical hospital mortality rates (2003-2004) to forecast future mortality (2005-2006).

Principal findings: The net effect of reliability adjustment was to greatly diminish apparent variation for all three operations. Reliability adjustment was also particularly important for identifying hospitals with the lowest future mortality. Without reliability adjustment, hospitals in the "best" quintile (2003-2004) with pancreatic resection had a mortality of 7.6 percent in 2005-2006; with reliability adjustment, the "best" hospital quintile had a mortality of 2.7 percent in 2005-2006. For AAA repair, reliability adjustment also improved the ability to identify hospitals with lower future mortality. For CABG, the benefits of reliability adjustment were limited to the lowest volume hospitals.

Conclusion: Reliability adjustment results in more stable estimates of mortality that better forecast future performance. This statistical technique is crucial for helping patients select the best hospitals for specific procedures, particularly uncommon ones, and should be used for public reporting of hospital mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation in Hospital Mortality Rates before and after Adjusting for Reliability. (Twenty Randomly Sampled Hospitals Are Shown for Each Procedure)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation in Mortality Rates across Hospital Quintiles, before and after Adjusting for Reliability
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ability of Mortality Rankings from an Earlier Time Period (2003–2004) to Forecast Future Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates (2005–2006)

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2008. “Inpatient Quality Indicators (IQI) Composite Measure Workgroup Final Report, March 2008” [accessed on March 5, 2010]. Available at http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/iqi/AHRQ_IQI_Workgroup_F.... - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Staiger DO. Operative Mortality and Procedure Volume as Predictors of Subsequent Hospital Performance. Annals of Surgery. 2006;243(3):411–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(15):1128–37. - PubMed
    1. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). 2010. “Hospital Compare Website” [accessed on March 5, 2010]. Available at http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov.
    1. Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Composite Measures for Predicting Hospital Mortality with Surgery. Health Affairs. 2009;28(4):1189–98. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms