Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;66(10):2309-19.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05398.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Terms used for isolation practices by nurses at an academic medical center

Timothy Landers  1 , Jessica McWalters, Maryam Behta, Gina Bufe, Barbara Ross, David K Vawdrey, Elaine Larson
Affiliations

Terms used for isolation practices by nurses at an academic medical center

Timothy Landers et al. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: This paper is a report of a study to determine if the terms used by nurses to describe isolation precautions are associated with correct identification of required personal protective equipment.

Background: Isolation measures are important in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. The terms used to describe categories of isolation have changed in response to new pathogens and with advances in infection prevention.

Methods: For 3 months in 2009, nurses from an academic medical center on the East Coast of the United States of America completed a survey consisting of ten clinical scenarios which asked about recommended personal protective equipment and for the name of the recommended isolation type. Correct identification of required personal protective equipment was compared to use of an approved isolation category term, controlling for infection knowledge and demographic variables.

Results: Three hundred and seventeen nurses gave responses to 2215 clinical scenarios. Use of non-approved category terms was associated with statistically significantly lower rates of correct personal protective equipment identification compared to use of an approved term (62.2% vs. 77.8%; P < 0.001). Specific PPE was also selected for use when not indicated - including gowns (42%), N-95 respirators (13%), fluid shield masks (13%) and sterile gloves (6%).

Conclusion: Inconsistent terminology for isolation precautions may contribute to variations in practice. Adoption of internationally accepted and standardized category terms may improve adherence to these precautions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aboelela SW, Saiman L, Stone P, Lowy FD, Quiros D, Larson E. Effectiveness of barrier precautions and surveillance cultures to control transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms: a systematic review of the literature. AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. 2006;34(8):484–494. - PubMed
    1. Boyce JM, Pittet D Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Association for Professionals in Infection Control. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Hand Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology: The Official Journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America. 2002;23(12 Suppl):S3–40. - PubMed
    1. Clock SA, Cohen B, Behta M, Ross B, Larson EL. Contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms: Current recommendations and actual practice. AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control. In Press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cole M, Lai L. Reviewing the efficacy of infection control isolation. British Journal of Nursing. 2009;18(7):403–4. 406–7. - PubMed
    1. Cookson B, Mathai E, Allegranzi B, Pessoa-Silva C, Nejad SB, Schneider A, Tschopp C, Wendt C, Pittet D. Comparison of national and subnational guidelines for hand hygiene. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2009;72(3):202–210. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types