Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening
- PMID: 20722888
- PMCID: PMC3303889
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01528.x
Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening
Abstract
Background: In 2002, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended routine osteoporosis screening for women aged 65 years or older. However, studies have indicated that osteoporosis remains underdiagnosed, and various methods such as the use of health information technology have been tried to increase screening rates. We investigated whether we could boost the low rates of bone mineral density testing with implementation of a point-of-care clinical decision support system in our primary care practice.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of female patients eligible for osteoporosis screening who had no prior bone mineral density test who were seen at our primary care practice sites in 2007 or 2008 (before and after implementation of a point-of-care clinical decision support system).
Results: Overall, screening rates were 80.1% in 2007 and 84.1% in 2008 (P < 0.001). Of patients who did not have osteoporosis screening before the visit, 5.87% completed the screening after the visit in 2007, compared with 9.79% in 2008 (when the clinical support system was implemented), a 66.7% improvement (P = 0.025).
Conclusion: Clinical decision support for primary care doctors significantly improved osteoporosis screening rates among eligible women. Carefully designed clinical decision support systems can optimize care delivery, ensuring that important preventive services such as osteoporosis screening for patients at risk for fracture are performed while unnecessary testing is avoided.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Comment in
-
Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening: how similar is the historical control?J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;18(4):925. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01872.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 22747583 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of osteoporosis screening completion rates in a primary care practice.Popul Health Manag. 2011 Oct;14(5):243-7. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0057. Epub 2011 Apr 20. Popul Health Manag. 2011. PMID: 21506729 Free PMC article.
-
Use of a Web-based clinical decision support system to improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in a primary care practice.J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):666-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01661.x. Epub 2011 Mar 15. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 21401808 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of visit length and a clinical decision support tool on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in a primary care practice.J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;18(3):593-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01625.x. Epub 2011 Jan 6. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 21210902 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice.Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.013. Am J Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 19285200 Review.
-
Update on Osteoporosis.Prim Care. 2019 Mar;46(1):175-190. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Dec 24. Prim Care. 2019. PMID: 30704657 Review.
Cited by
-
Race and Age Impact Osteoporosis Screening Rates in Women Prior to Hip Fracture.Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Feb 12;17(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01076-y. Arch Osteoporos. 2022. PMID: 35150320
-
Design and Development of an Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System Applied to the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Risk.J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 27;12(2):169. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020169. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35207657 Free PMC article.
-
Bone health management in men undergoing ADT: examining enablers and barriers to care.Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar;26(3):951-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2997-6. Epub 2014 Dec 20. Osteoporos Int. 2015. PMID: 25526712
-
The Impact of Multifaceted Osteoporosis Group Education on Patients' Decision-Making regarding Treatment Options and Lifestyle Changes.J Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 26;2018:9703602. doi: 10.1155/2018/9703602. eCollection 2018. J Osteoporos. 2018. PMID: 29785259 Free PMC article.
-
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.BMJ. 2017 Jan 19;356:i6755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6755. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 28104610 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Osteoporosis Foundation. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation; Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Available at: http://www.nof.org/professionals/NOF_Clinicians_Guide.pdf (last accessed 28 July 2010)
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(6):526–528. - PubMed
-
- Lim LS, Hoeksema LJ, Sherin K. Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(4):366–375. - PubMed
-
- Gallagher TC, Geling O, Comite F. Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(4):450–456. - PubMed
-
- Davis K, Doty MM, Shea K, Stremikis K. Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction. Health Policy. 2009;90(2–3):239–246. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical