Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 19:10:505.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-505.

Young pregnant women's views on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care

Affiliations

Young pregnant women's views on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care

Jade E Bilardi et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: In pregnancy, untreated chlamydia infection has been associated with adverse outcomes for both mother and infant. Like most women, pregnant women infected with chlamydia do not report genital symptoms, and are therefore unlikely to be aware of their infection. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of screening pregnant women aged 16-25 years for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care.

Methods: As part of a larger prospective, cross-sectional study of pregnant women aged 16-25 years attending antenatal services across Melbourne, Australia, 100 women were invited to participate in a face-to-face, semi structured interview on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia during pregnancy. Women infected with chlamydia were oversampled (n = 31).

Results: Women had low levels of awareness of chlamydia before the test, retained relatively little knowledge after the test and commonly had misconceptions around chlamydia transmission, testing and sequelae. Women indicated a high level of acceptance and support for chlamydia screening, expressing their willingness to undertake whatever care was necessary to ensure the health of their baby. There was a strong preference for urine testing over other methods of specimen collection. Women questioned why testing was not already conducted alongside other antenatal STI screening tests, particularly in view of the risks chlamydia poses to the baby. Women who tested positive for chlamydia had mixed reactions, however, most felt relief and gratitude at having had chlamydia detected and reported high levels of partner support.

Conclusions: Chlamydia screening as part of routine antenatal care was considered highly acceptable among young pregnant women who recognized the benefits of screening and strongly supported its implementation as part of routine antenatal care. The acceptability of screening is important to the uptake of chlamydia screening in future antenatal screening strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: Overview and estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
    1. Cates WJ, Wasserheit J. Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164(6):1771–1781. - PubMed
    1. Peipert JF. Clinical practice. Genital chlamydial infections. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(25):2424–2430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp030542. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen I, Veille J, Calkins B. Improved pregnancy outcome following successful treatment of chlamydial infection. JAMA. 1990;263:3160–3163. doi: 10.1001/jama.263.23.3160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin DH, Koutsky L, Eschenbach DA, Daling JR, Alexander ER, Benedetti JK, Holmes KK. Prematurity and perinatal mortality in pregnancies complicated by maternal Chlamydia trachomatis infections. JAMA. 1982;247(11):1585–1588. doi: 10.1001/jama.247.11.1585. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types