Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study
- PMID: 20723605
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.012
Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study
Abstract
Neuroscientific research on the perception of emotional signals has mainly focused on how the brain processes threat signals from photographs of facial expressions. Much less is known about body postures or about the processing of dynamic images. We undertook a systematic comparison of the neurofunctional network dedicated to processing facial and bodily expressions. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments investigated whether areas involved in processing social signals are activated differently by threatening signals (fear and anger) from facial or bodily expressions. The amygdala (AMG) was more active for facial than for bodily expressions. Body stimuli triggered higher activation than face stimuli in a number of areas. These were the cuneus, fusiform gyrus (FG), extrastriate body area (EBA), temporoparietal junction (TPJ), superior parietal lobule (SPL), primary somatosensory cortex (SI), as well as the thalamus. Emotion-specific effects were found in TPJ and FG for bodies and faces alike. EBA and superior temporal sulcus (STS) were more activated by threatening bodies.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Emotions in motion: dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:100-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.075. Epub 2009 Jun 6. Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19501062
-
Specific and common brain regions involved in the perception of faces and bodies and the representation of their emotional expressions.Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(2):101-20. doi: 10.1080/17470910701865367. Soc Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19255912
-
Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):174-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 16854439 Review.
-
Functional mapping of dynamic happy and fearful facial expression processing in adolescents.Brain Imaging Behav. 2010 Jun;4(2):164-76. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9096-x. Brain Imaging Behav. 2010. PMID: 20502991
-
Emotional perception: meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing.Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2524-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Neuroimage. 2011. PMID: 20951215 Review.
Cited by
-
Subcortical BOLD responses during visual sexual stimulation vary as a function of implicit porn associations in women.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Feb;9(2):158-66. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss117. Epub 2012 Oct 9. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 23051899 Free PMC article.
-
Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Sep;40(13):3753-3768. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24629. Epub 2019 May 14. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019. PMID: 31090126 Free PMC article.
-
A novel V1a receptor antagonist blocks vasopressin-induced changes in the CNS response to emotional stimuli: an fMRI study.Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Dec 12;7:100. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00100. eCollection 2013. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24376401 Free PMC article.
-
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1686-1717. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28092078 Review.
-
Dissimilar processing of emotional facial expressions in human and monkey temporal cortex.Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:402-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.083. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23142071 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical