Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan;60(1):86-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

Insufficient sensitivity of hemoglobin A(₁C) determination in diagnosis or screening of early diabetic states

Affiliations

Insufficient sensitivity of hemoglobin A(₁C) determination in diagnosis or screening of early diabetic states

Stefan S Fajans et al. Metabolism. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

An International Expert Committee made recommendations for using the hemoglobin A(₁C) (A1C) assay as the preferred method for the diagnosis of diabetes in nonpregnant individuals. A concentration of at least 6.5% was considered as diagnostic. It is the aim of this study to compare the sensitivity of A1C with that of plasma glucose concentrations in subjects with early diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). We chose 2 groups of subjects who had A1C not exceeding 6.4%. The first group of 89 subjects had family histories of diabetes (MODY or type 2 diabetes mellitus) and had oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and A1C determinations. They included 36 subjects with diabetes or IGT and 53 with normal OGTT. The second group of 58 subjects was screened for diabetes in our Diabetes Clinic by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, or OGTT and A1C; and similar comparisons were made. Subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia, had A1C ranging from 5.0% to 6.4% (mean, 5.8%). The subjects with normal OGTT had A1C of 4.2% to 6.3% (mean, 5.4%), or 5.5% for the 2 groups. The A1C may be in the normal range in subjects with diabetes or IGT, including those with fasting hyperglycemia. Approximately one third of subjects with early diabetes and IGT have A1C less than 5.7%, the cut point that the American Diabetes Association recommends as indicating the onset of risk of developing diabetes in the future. The results of our study are similar to those obtained by a large Dutch epidemiologic study. If our aim is to recognize early diabetic states to apply effective prophylactic procedures to prevent or delay progression to more severe diabetes, A1C is not sufficiently sensitive or reliable for diagnosis of diabetes or IGT. A combination of A1C and plasma glucose determinations, where necessary, is recommended for diagnosis or screening of diabetes or IGT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure Statement: The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OGTTs for 5 groups of subjects: A: diabetes with FPG > 126 mg/dl; B: diabetes with FPG 100 – 125 mg/dl; C: diabetes with FPG < 100 mg/dl; D: subjects with IGT; and E: subjects with normal OGTT. The figure shows the differences between A and E are significant at all time points at p < 0.001. The same is true for B vs E. For C vs E the difference is p < 0.001 for ½, 1, 1-½, 2, and 2-½ hrs. For D vs E the differences are < .0001 at ½, 1, 1-½, and 2 hr.

References

    1. International Expert Committee. International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1327–1334. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–1197. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: World Health Org; 1999. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications: Report of a WHO consultation.
    1. Herman WH. Diabetes epidemiology: guiding clinical and public health practice: the Kelly West Award lecture. Diabetes Care. 2006;30:1912–9. - PubMed
    1. Mohan V, Vijayachandrika V, Gokulakrishnan K, et al. A1C cut points to define various glucose intolerance groups in Asian Indians. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):515–9. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types