Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jun;14(2):84-95.
doi: 10.1177/1084713810375249.

Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation

Affiliations
Review

Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation

Julie Arenberg Bierer. Trends Amplif. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Cochlear implants are highly successful neural prostheses for persons with severe or profound hearing loss who gain little benefit from hearing aid amplification. Although implants are capable of providing important spectral and temporal cues for speech perception, performance on speech tests is variable across listeners. Psychophysical measures obtained from individual implant subjects can also be highly variable across implant channels. This review discusses evidence that such variability reflects deviations in the electrode-neuron interface, which refers to an implant channel's ability to effectively stimulate the auditory nerve. It is proposed that focused electrical stimulation is ideally suited to assess channel-to-channel irregularities in the electrode-neuron interface. In implant listeners, it is demonstrated that channels with relatively high thresholds, as measured with the tripolar configuration, exhibit broader psychophysical tuning curves and smaller dynamic ranges than channels with relatively low thresholds. Broader tuning implies that frequency-specific information intended for one population of neurons in the cochlea may activate more distant neurons, and a compressed dynamic range could make it more difficult to resolve intensity-based information, particularly in the presence of competing noise. Degradation of both types of cues would negatively affect speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the electrode–neuron interface
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic of electrode configurations
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Neural activation patterns from the inferior colliculus of the anesthetized guinea pig for three electrode configurations
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Behavioral thresholds and speech perception
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Growth of loudness and neural activation

References

    1. Baskent D., Shannon R. V. (2004). Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3130–3140 - PubMed
    1. Bierer J. A. (2007). Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: Evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1642–1653 - PubMed
    1. Bierer J. A., Faulkner K. F. (2010). Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: Partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds, and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear and Hearing, 31, 247–258 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bierer J. A., Middlebrooks J. C. (2002). Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 478–492 - PubMed
    1. Busby P. A., Whitford L. A., Blamey P. J., Richardson L. M., Clarke G. M. (1994). Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2658–2669 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources