Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;3(6):35-8.

Three-dimensional, Full-sized, Silicone-based, Facial Replicas for Teaching Outcome Measures in Acne

Three-dimensional, Full-sized, Silicone-based, Facial Replicas for Teaching Outcome Measures in Acne

Jerry K L Tan et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The scientific integrity of outcome measurements is dependent upon reproducibility and accuracy. In acne assessments, there is no current gold standard for accuracy in lesion counting and global grading.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to create facial acne replicas for use in acne training and for evaluation of rater accuracy.

Methods: Two full-sized, three-dimensional, silicone-based, facial replicas with predetermined acne lesion type and number were created. Their teaching value was evaluated by dermatologists and clinical coordinators undergoing training in acne evaluations. A questionnaire after the training session addressed realism, preferences, and ease of assessments with the facial replicas compared to live subjects.

Results: Of 55 potential respondents, 32 questionnaires were completed and analyzable. Of these, 23 were from dermatologists and nine were from clinical research coordinators performing acne assessments. The facial replicas were considered sufficiently realistic for acne lesion counting by 91 percent (29/32) and for global grading by 94 percent (30/32). Of these, 66 percent preferred to have both real subjects and replicas for training (21/32), 31 percent preferred real subjects only (9/32), and one preferred replicas only. Replicas were considered easier to evaluate for noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions (p=0.002 and p=0.013, respectively) and equivalent to live models for global grading (p=0.001).

Limitations: Shortcomings include the limited spectrum of acne that could be represented due to production of only two prototypes, the relative paucity of secondary lesions, and production time and cost.

Conclusion: These facial replicas provide a realistic and practical method for teaching and evaluating raters in acne outcome measures as they provide a gold standard for acne lesion counts. Furthermore, their use may obviate some of the shortcomings inherent in recruitment of human acne volunteers for acne training sessions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figures 1A–1C
Figures 1A–1C
Three views of facial acne replica 1
Figures 1A–1C
Figures 1A–1C
Three views of facial acne replica 1
Figures 1A–1C
Figures 1A–1C
Three views of facial acne replica 1
Figures 2A–2C
Figures 2A–2C
Three views of facial acne replica 2
Figures 2A–2C
Figures 2A–2C
Three views of facial acne replica 2
Figures 2A–2C
Figures 2A–2C
Three views of facial acne replica 2

Similar articles

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Guidance for Industry; AcneVulgaris: Developing Drugs for Treatment; September 2005.
    1. Lucky AW, Barber BL, Girman CJ, et al. A multirater validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:559–565. - PubMed
    1. Tan JK, Fung K, Bulger L. Reliability of dermatologists in acne lesion counts and global assessments. J Cutan Med Surg. 2006;10:160–165. - PubMed
    1. Worm AM, Hadjivassiliou H, Katsambas A. The Greek moulages: a picture of skin diseases in former times. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:515–519. - PubMed
    1. Geiges ML. Traces of Marion B. Sulzberger in the Museum of Wax Moulages in Zurich and their importance for the history of dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:980–984. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources