Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;21(2):426-33.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1927-z. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Affiliations

Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Jean-François Budzik et al. Eur Radiol. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To (1) obtain microstructural parameters (Fractional Anisotropy: FA, Mean Diffusivity: MD) of the cervical spinal cord in patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using tractography, (2) to compare DTI parameters with the clinical assessment of these patients (3) and with information issued from conventional sequences.

Methods: DTI was performed on 20 symptomatic patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, matched with 15 volunteers. FA and MD were calculated from tractography images at the C2-C3 level and compressed level in patients and at the C2-C3 and C4-C7 in controls. Patients were clinically evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire.

Results: The FA values of patients were significantly lower at the compressed level than the FA of volunteers at the C4-C7 level. A significant positive correlation between FA at the compressed level and clinical assessment was demonstrated. Increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images did not correlate either with FA or MD values, or with any of the clinical scores.

Conclusion: FA values were significantly correlated with some of the patients' clinical scores. High signal intensity of the spinal cord on T2 was not correlated either with the DTI parameters or with the clinical assessment, suggesting that FA is more sensitive than T2 imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 May;27(5):978-91 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):168-77 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Apr 1;21(7):827-33 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Aug;29(7):1279-84 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):655-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources