A randomised trial of peer review: the UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project
- PMID: 20726448
- PMCID: PMC12175273
- DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-3-223
A randomised trial of peer review: the UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project
Abstract
Peer review has been widely employed within the NHS to facilitate health quality improvement but has not been rigorously evaluated. This article reports the largest randomised trial of peer review ever conducted in the UK. The peer review intervention was a reciprocal supportive exercise that included clinicians, hospital management, commissioners and patients which focused on the quality of the provision of four specific evidence-based aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care. Follow up at 12 months demonstrated few quantitative differences in the number or quality of services offered in the two groups. Qualitative data in contrast suggested many benefits of peer review in most but not all intervention units and some control teams. Findings suggest peer review in this format is a positive experience for most participants but is ineffective in some situations. Its longer term benefits and cost effectiveness require further study. The generic findings of this study have potential implications for the application of peer review throughout the NHS.
Comment in
-
Endorsement of peer review.Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Dec;10(6):639-40. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-6-639a. Clin Med (Lond). 2010. PMID: 21416672 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Heaton C. External peer review in Europe: an overview from the ExPeRT project. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:177–182. 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.177 10.1093/intqhc/12.3.177 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Roberts CM, Buckingham RJ, Stone RA, Lowe D, Pearson MG. The UK National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP) – A feasibility study of large scale clinical service peer review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 - PubMed
-
- Roberts CM, Barnes S, Lowe D. Pearson MG. Evidence for a link between mortality in acute COPD and hospital type and resources. Thorax. 2003;58:947–949. 10.1136/thorax.58.11.947 10.1136/thorax.58.11.947 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Intermediate care – Hospital-at-Home in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2007;63f:200–210. 10.1136/thx.2006.064931 10.1136/thx.2006.064931 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Uncited references
-
- Price L, Lowe D, Anstey K, et al. The UK national COPD audit 2003. Impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerbation. Thorax. 2006;61:837–842. 10.1136/thx.2005.049940 10.1136/thx.2005.049940 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax. 1997;52(supp 5):1–28. 10.1136/thx.52.2008.S1 10.1136/thx.52.2008.S1 - DOI - DOI
-
- British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Sub-committee on Pulmonary Rehabilitation BTS statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Thorax. 2001;11:827–834.
-
- Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:003793. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical