Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;174(3):325-30.
doi: 10.1667/RR1979.1.

Effects of proton radiation dose, dose rate and dose fractionation on hematopoietic cells in mice

Affiliations

Effects of proton radiation dose, dose rate and dose fractionation on hematopoietic cells in mice

J H Ware et al. Radiat Res. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the acute effects of radiation dose, dose rate and fractionation as well as the energy of protons in hematopoietic cells of irradiated mice. The mice were irradiated with a single dose of 51.24 MeV protons at a dose of 2 Gy and a dose rate of 0.05-0.07 Gy/min or 1 GeV protons at doses of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 Gy delivered in a single dose at dose rates of 0.05 or 0.5 Gy/min or in five daily dose fractions at a dose rate of 0.05 Gy/min. Sham-irradiated animals were used as controls. The results demonstrate a dose-dependent loss of white blood cells (WBCs) and lymphocytes by up to 61% and 72%, respectively, in mice irradiated with protons at doses up to 2 Gy. The results also demonstrate that the dose rate, fractionation pattern and energy of the proton radiation did not have significant effects on WBC and lymphocyte counts in the irradiated animals. These results suggest that the acute effects of proton radiation on WBC and lymphocyte counts are determined mainly by the radiation dose, with very little contribution from the dose rate (over the range of dose rates evaluated), fractionation and energy of the protons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Dose–response effects of proton radiation on WBC counts in irradiated mice. The mice were irradiated with 1 GeV protons in five daily dose fractions at a dose rate of 0.05–0.07 Gy/min or in a single dose at a high (0.5 Gy/min) or low (0.05 Gy/min) dose rate (5–10 mice per group). The WBC counts were determined 24 h after the last radiation exposure. The results were compared among different treatment groups by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The statistical significance of the difference between the sham-irradiated control and each of the irradiated groups is indicated by asterisks (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 by Tukey’s test). The error bars represent standard errors.
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Dose–response effects of proton radiation on lymphocyte counts in irradiated mice. The mice were irradiated with 1 GeV protons in five daily dose fractions at a dose rate of 0.05–0.07 Gy/min or in a single dose at a high (0.5 Gy/min) or low (0.05 Gy/min) dose rate (5–10 mice per group). The lymphocyte counts were determined 24 h after the last radiation exposure. The results were compared among different treatment groups by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The statistical significance for the difference between the sham-irradiated control and each of the irradiated groups is indicated by asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 by Tukey’s test). The error bars represent standard errors.
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
Comparison of WBC and lymphocyte counts among mice irradiated with 1 GeV and 51.24 MeV protons at a dose of 2 Gy. The mice were irradiated with 1 GeV protons in five daily dose fractions at a dose rate of 0.05–0.07 Gy/min (1-GeV, FD) or in a single dose at a high (1-GeV, HDR) or low (1-GeV, LDR) dose rate or with 51.24 MeV protons in a single dose at a dose rate of 0.05–0.07 Gy/min (51.24–MeV) (5–10 mice per group). The WBC and lymphocyte counts were determined 24 h after the last radiation exposure. The results were compared among different treatment groups by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. The statistical significance for the difference between the sham-irradiated control and each of the irradiated groups is indicated by asterisks (***P < 0.001 by Tukey’s test). The error bars represent standard errors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hellweg CE, Baumstark-Khan C. Getting ready for the manned mission to Mars: the astronauts’ risk from space radiation. Naturwissenschaften. 2007;94:517–526. - PubMed
    1. Wilson JW, Cucinotta FA, Shinn JL, Simonsen LC, Dubey RR, Jordan WR, Jones TD, Chang CK, Kim MY. Shielding from solar particle event exposures in deep space. Radiat Res. 1999;30:361–382. - PubMed
    1. Smart DF, Shea MA. The local time dependence of the anisotropic solar cosmic ray flux. Adv Space Res. 2003;32:109–114. - PubMed
    1. Koenig KL, Goans RE, Hatchett RJ, Mettler FA, Jr, Schumacher TA, Noji EK, Jarrett DG. Medical treatment of radiological casualties: current concepts. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:643–652. - PubMed
    1. Coleman CN, Blakely WF, Fike JR, MacVittie TJ, Metting NF, Mitchell JB, Moulder JE, Preston RJ, Seed TM, Wong RS. Radiat Res; Molecular and cellular biology of moderate-dose (1–10 Gy) radiation and potential mechanisms of radiation protection: report of a workshop; Bethesda, Maryland. December 17–18, 2001; 2003. pp. 812–834. - PubMed

Publication types