Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct 30;83(5):214-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.08.008. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

Mindreading in individuals with an empathizing versus systemizing cognitive style: An fMRI study

F Focquaert  1 , M S Steven-Wheeler, S Vanneste, K W Doron, S M Platek
Affiliations

Mindreading in individuals with an empathizing versus systemizing cognitive style: An fMRI study

F Focquaert et al. Brain Res Bull. .

Abstract

Our fMRI study compares the neural correlates of face-based mindreading in healthy individuals with an empathizing (n=12) versus systemizing cognitive style (n=12). The empathizing group consists of individuals that score high on empathizing and low on systemizing, while the systemizing group consists of individuals with an opposite cognitive pattern. We hypothesize that the empathizing group will show stronger simulation-type neural activity (e.g., in mirror neuron areas, medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex) or simulation-related neural activity (e.g., in areas involved in perspective taking and experiential processing) compared to the systemizing group. As hypothesized, our study reveals that the empathizing group shows significantly stronger activity in mirror neuron areas of the brain, such as the left inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe, and in temporal areas involved in perspective taking and autobiographical memory. Moreover, the empathizing group, but not the systemizing group, shows activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex which have been related to simulation-type neural activity in the brain and are central to mindreading. Also, the systemizing group shows significantly stronger activity in the left parahippocampal gyrus. In conclusion, both the empathizing and systemizing individuals show simulation-type and simulation-related neural activity during face-based mindreading. However, more neural activity indicative of simulation-based processing is seen in the empathizing individuals, while more neural activity indicative of non-simulation-based processing is seen in the systemizing individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overvie experimental design
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differential contrast analysis; systemizing>empathizing: mindreading > gender
The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. The areas showing significantly stronger activation during face-based mindreading in the systemizing group. Images are in neurological convention. Right=right. Left=left. RH activation: BA 6. LH activation: BA 21, BA 38, BA 47, BA 27.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differential contrast analysis; empathizing > systemizing: mindreading>gender. The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. The areas showing significantly stronger activation during face-based mindreading in the empathizing group. Images are in neurological convention. Right = right. Left = left. LH activation: BA 44, BA 45, BA 47, and BA 40. Bilateral activation: BA 22, BA 21, BA 39, BA 18, BA 19 and BA 37.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROI analysis (mindreading>gender). The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. A: LBA 40, empathizing>systemizing; B: LBA 44, empathizing>systemizing; C: RBA 22, empathizing>systemizing; D: RBA 22, systemizing>empathizing. Images are in neurological convention. Right=right. Left=left.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROI analysis (mindreading>gender). The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. A: LBA 40, empathizing>systemizing; B: LBA 44, empathizing>systemizing; C: RBA 22, empathizing>systemizing; D: RBA 22, systemizing>empathizing. Images are in neurological convention. Right=right. Left=left.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROI analysis (mindreading>gender). The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. A: LBA 40, empathizing>systemizing; B: LBA 44, empathizing>systemizing; C: RBA 22, empathizing>systemizing; D: RBA 22, systemizing>empathizing. Images are in neurological convention. Right=right. Left=left.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROI analysis (mindreading>gender). The results are displayed on a 3D rendered brain averaged from all subjects in the study. A: LBA 40, empathizing>systemizing; B: LBA 44, empathizing>systemizing; C: RBA 22, empathizing>systemizing; D: RBA 22, systemizing>empathizing. Images are in neurological convention. Right=right. Left=left.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baron-Cohen S. The Truth about the Male and Female Brain. Perseus; New York: 2003. The Essential Difference.
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, Robertson M. Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. J Child Psychol Psyc. 1997;38:813–822. - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Knickmeyer RC, Belmonte MK. Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science. 2005;310:819–823. - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Richler J, Bisarya D, Gurunathan N, Wheelwright S. The systemizing quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philos T Roy Soc B. 2003;358:361–374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Wheelwright S, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Simmons A, Williams SCR. Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:1891–1898. - PubMed

Publication types