Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Sep;39(6):336-42.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29930707.

Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures

Y Sirin et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: the aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT in artificially created fractures of the sheep mandibular condyle.

Methods: 63 full-thickness sheep heads were used in this study. Two surgeons created the fractures, which were either displaced or non-displaced. CBCT images were acquired by the NewTom 3G CBCT scanner (NIM, Verona, Italy) and CT imaging was performed using the Toshiba Aquillon multislice CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). Two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were evaluated by two observers who were asked to determine the presence or absence of fracture and displacement, the type of fracture, anatomical localization and type of displacement. The naked-eye inspection during surgery served as the gold standard. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated with weighted kappa statistics. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare statistically the area under the curve (AUC) of both imaging modalities.

Results: kappa coefficients of intra- and interobserver agreement scores varied between 0.56 - 0.98, which were classified as moderate and excellent, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the imaging modalities, which were both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of sheep condylar fractures.

Conclusions: this study confirms that CBCT is similar to CT in the diagnosis of different types of experimentally created sheep condylar fractures and can provide a cost- and dose-effective diagnostic option.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three-dimensional CT view of an anterior condyle displacement
Figure 2
Figure 2
Axial CT and cone beam CT views of bilateral condyle fractures with displacement. Right side (R): medial displacement, left side (L): lateral displacement
Figure 3
Figure 3
Oblique CT view of a comminuted fracture (left) and a sham operated condyle (right)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Three-dimensional reconstruction of a posteriorly displaced condyle fracture in cone beam CT
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cone beam CT of bilateral fractured condyles from the coronal plane. Medial displacement on the left and a fracture without displacement on the right side are clearly visible
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cone beam CT imaging from the sagittal plane, note the posterior displacement of the condyle fracture
Figure 7
Figure 7
Schematic presentation of the condylar fracture types and the distribution of experimental groups. TMJ, temporomandibular joint

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Consensus conferenceonopenorclosedmanagementofcondylarfractures 12th ICOMS. Budapest, 1995. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:243–267 - PubMed
    1. Bos RR, Ward Booth RP, de Bont LG. Mandibular condyle fractures: a consensus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;37:87–89 - PubMed
    1. Andersson J, Hallmer F, Eriksson L. Unilateral mandibular condylar fractures: a 31-year follow-up of non-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:310–314 - PubMed
    1. Haug RH, Brandt MT. Closed reduction, open reduction, and endoscopic assistance: current thoughts on the management of mandibular condyle fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:90s–102s - PubMed
    1. Ellis E, Throckmorton GS. Treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: biological considerations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:115–134 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms