Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;195(3):744-50.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3364.

Whole-body MRI in suspected infant abuse

Affiliations

Whole-body MRI in suspected infant abuse

Jeannette M Perez-Rossello et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of our study was to examine the utility of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) in the detection of skeletal and soft-tissue injuries in suspected infant abuse.

Materials and methods: Twenty-one infants (0-12 months) underwent WB-MRI for evaluation of suspected child abuse. WB-MRI at 1.5 T was performed using coronal and sagittal STIR sequences within 5 days of initial skeletal survey. Follow-up skeletal survey was performed in 16 cases. The "truth" was determined by integrating the initial and follow-up skeletal surveys, where available, into a summary of skeletal injuries (summary skeletal survey). Statistics included analysis of counts and proportions, concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Summary skeletal survey and WB-MRI identified 167 fractures or areas of skeletal signal abnormality: 46 (27.5%) by both techniques, 68 (40.7%) by summary skeletal survey only, and 53 (31.7%) by WB-MRI only. WB-MRI had high specificity (95%) but low sensitivity (40%) for identifying fractures or signal abnormalities compared with summary skeletal survey. Thirty-seven classic metaphyseal lesions or metaphyseal signal abnormalities were identified: 11 (29.7%) by both techniques, 24 (64.8%) by summary skeletal survey only, and two (5.4%) by WB-MRI only. WB-MRI had very low sensitivity (31%) for identifying signal abnormality where classic metaphyseal lesions were seen with skeletal survey. WB-MRI had low sensitivity (57%) for identifying signal abnormality in areas where rib fractures were seen on skeletal survey. WB-MRI identified soft-tissue injuries such as muscle edema and joint effusions that, in some cases, led to identifying additional fractures.

Conclusion: WB-MRI is insensitive in the detection of classic metaphyseal lesions and rib fractures, high specificity indicators of infant abuse. WB-MRI cannot replace the skeletal survey but may complement it by identifying soft-tissue abnormalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources