Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Aug 9:6:449-55.

Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure

Inder S Anand et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. .

Abstract

Background: The safety of once-daily (qd) dosing of valsartan in heart failure (HF) patients is not known.

Hypothesis: This 10-week, double-blind trial examined the relative safety and efficacy of valsartan administered qd versus twice-daily (bid).

Methods: HF patients (NYHA class II-III) receiving diuretics (87%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (98%), beta-blockers (92%), aldosterone antagonists (25%), or digoxin (32%) were randomized to valsartan 40 mg bid (n = 60) or 80 mg qd (n = 55) and titrated to a maximum dose of 320 mg/day; doubling the dose every 2 weeks. Clinical and biochemical parameters were measured at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10.

Results: The average dose of valsartan at the end of study was 245 mg in the bid group vs 256 mg in the qd group (P = NS). Similar proportions of patients tolerated qd vs bid dosing (bid 67% vs qd 68%). Outcome measures including reduction in blood pressure, incidence of hypotension, renal impairment, orthostatic dizziness or fatigue, changes in serum K(+), creatinine, cystatin-C, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar between the 2 groups at all time-points. Brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased and plasma renin activity increased from baseline by the same amount in both groups at all time-points.

Conclusion: Valsartan administered qd has a similar safety and tolerability profile with comparable 24-hour RAAS blockade, as assessed by increases in PRA, as bid dosing in patients with moderate to severe (NYHA class II-III) heart failure.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00294086.

Keywords: angiotensin receptor blocker; heart failure; valsartan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of patients tolerating valsartan once-daily (qd) or twice-daily (bid) dosing regimen using observed cases. Using data from observed cases, the percentage of patients able to tolerate the dosing regimen at the end of the study was 78% for bid dosing and 72% for qd dosing (P = 0.56). Inability to tolerate the dosing regimen was defined as any of the following: serum potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L, elevations in serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL and increased by >50% from baseline, reduction in standing SBP (<90 mmHg), symptoms related to hypotension (eg, syncope, faintness, or orthostatic dizziness), worsening of NYHA functional class (eg, fatigue or breathlessness) in patients with stable CHF (NYHA class II–III).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435. - PubMed
    1. The SOLVD Investigators Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293–302. - PubMed
    1. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. for the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1349–1355. - PubMed
    1. CIBIS II Investigators and Committees The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II): a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9–13. - PubMed
    1. Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) Study Group Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1999;353:2001–2007. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data