Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure
- PMID: 20730060
- PMCID: PMC2922305
Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure
Abstract
Background: The safety of once-daily (qd) dosing of valsartan in heart failure (HF) patients is not known.
Hypothesis: This 10-week, double-blind trial examined the relative safety and efficacy of valsartan administered qd versus twice-daily (bid).
Methods: HF patients (NYHA class II-III) receiving diuretics (87%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (98%), beta-blockers (92%), aldosterone antagonists (25%), or digoxin (32%) were randomized to valsartan 40 mg bid (n = 60) or 80 mg qd (n = 55) and titrated to a maximum dose of 320 mg/day; doubling the dose every 2 weeks. Clinical and biochemical parameters were measured at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10.
Results: The average dose of valsartan at the end of study was 245 mg in the bid group vs 256 mg in the qd group (P = NS). Similar proportions of patients tolerated qd vs bid dosing (bid 67% vs qd 68%). Outcome measures including reduction in blood pressure, incidence of hypotension, renal impairment, orthostatic dizziness or fatigue, changes in serum K(+), creatinine, cystatin-C, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar between the 2 groups at all time-points. Brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased and plasma renin activity increased from baseline by the same amount in both groups at all time-points.
Conclusion: Valsartan administered qd has a similar safety and tolerability profile with comparable 24-hour RAAS blockade, as assessed by increases in PRA, as bid dosing in patients with moderate to severe (NYHA class II-III) heart failure.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00294086.
Keywords: angiotensin receptor blocker; heart failure; valsartan.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Proteinuria, chronic kidney disease, and the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker in addition to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with moderate to severe heart failure.Circulation. 2009 Oct 20;120(16):1577-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.853648. Epub 2009 Oct 5. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19805651 Clinical Trial.
-
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17617280 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of the combination of valsartan and benazepril in patients with chronic renal disease. European Group for the Investigation of Valsartan in Chronic Renal Disease.J Hypertens. 2000 Jan;18(1):89-95. J Hypertens. 2000. PMID: 10678548 Clinical Trial.
-
Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.Drugs. 2009;69(17):2393-414. doi: 10.2165/11319460-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19911855 Review.
-
Valsartan in chronic heart failure.Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Mar;39(3):460-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E327. Epub 2005 Feb 1. Ann Pharmacother. 2005. PMID: 15687480 Review.
Cited by
-
Relation between therapy-induced changes in natriuretic peptide levels and long-term therapeutic effects on mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 May;21(5):613-620. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1411. Epub 2019 Mar 27. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019. PMID: 30919541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Twice-daily versus once-daily lisinopril and losartan for hypertension: Real-world effectiveness and safety.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243371. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33270787 Free PMC article.
-
Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;33(2):385-92. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000397. J Hypertens. 2015. PMID: 25259546 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435. - PubMed
-
- The SOLVD Investigators Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293–302. - PubMed
-
- Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. for the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1349–1355. - PubMed
-
- CIBIS II Investigators and Committees The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II): a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9–13. - PubMed
-
- Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) Study Group Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1999;353:2001–2007. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous