Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: approval and efficacy
- PMID: 20730068
- PMCID: PMC2922313
- DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s6989
Dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: approval and efficacy
Abstract
Dronedarone, a new Class III antiarrhythmic agent, has now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Approval came in March 2009 due to the positive results of the ATHENA trial showing significant reductions in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization with dronedarone use. A post hoc analysis of the ATHENA data also suggested a decrease in stroke risk with this agent. However, due to safety concerns in the heart failure population in the earlier ANDROMEDA trial, dronedarone is not recommended for patients with an ejection fraction <35% and recent decompensated heart failure. Dronedarone is an amiodarone analog with multichannel blocking electrophysiologic properties similar to those of amiodarone, but several structural differences. Dronedarone's lack of the iodine moiety reduces its potential for thyroid and pulmonary toxicity. Preliminary data from the DIONYSOS trial, and an indirect meta-analysis comparing amiodarone with dronedarone, showed amiodarone to be more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm, while dronedarone was associated with fewer adverse effects resulting in early termination of the drug. Dronedarone is the first antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter shown to reduce cardiovascular hospitalizations. In patients with structural heart disease who have an ejection fraction >35% and no recent decompensated heart failure, dronedarone should be considered earlier than amiodarone in the treatment algorithm.
Keywords: amiodarone; atrial fibrillation; atrial flutter; dronedarone.
Similar articles
-
Post-ATHENA and beyond.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;31(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9550-8. Epub 2011 Feb 19. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21336617 Clinical Trial.
-
A review of the appropriate and inappropriate use of dronedarone: lessons learned from controlled studies and regulatory submission.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;15(4 Suppl):24S-30S. doi: 10.1177/1074248410368276. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010. PMID: 21098416 Review.
-
Dronedarone: an amiodarone analog for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Apr;41(4):599-605. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H524. Epub 2007 Mar 27. Ann Pharmacother. 2007. PMID: 17389667 Review.
-
The role of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter in the aftermath of PALLAS.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014 Nov;10(4):303-8. doi: 10.2174/1573403x10666140513110247. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2014. PMID: 24821656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost burden of cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality in ATHENA-like patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in the United States.Clin Cardiol. 2010 May;33(5):270-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.20759. Clin Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20513065 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter.Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011;5:103-19. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S6677. Epub 2011 Oct 6. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 22084608 Free PMC article.
-
Dronedarone: current evidence for its safety and efficacy in the management of atrial fibrillation.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011 Jan 6;5:27-39. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S10315. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011. PMID: 21267357 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Post-ATHENA and beyond.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;31(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9550-8. Epub 2011 Feb 19. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 21336617 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of dronedarone in patients previously treated with other antiarrhythmic agents.Clin Cardiol. 2014 Dec;37(12):717-24. doi: 10.1002/clc.22342. Epub 2014 Dec 2. Clin Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25470298 Free PMC article.
-
Benefit-risk assessment of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;36(2):93-110. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0012-8. Drug Saf. 2013. PMID: 23329540 Review.
References
-
- Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119–125. - PubMed
-
- Friberg J, Buch P, Scharling H, et al. Rising rates of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation. Epidemiology. 2003;14:666–672. - PubMed
-
- AFFIRM Investigators A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825–1833. - PubMed
-
- Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation. 2004;109:1509–1513. - PubMed
-
- Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:854–906. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical