Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 13;5(8):e11963.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011963.

Evaluation of five methods for total DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles

Affiliations

Evaluation of five methods for total DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles

Hong Chen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: DNA extraction is a routine step in many insect molecular studies. A variety of methods have been used to isolate DNA molecules from insects, and many commercial kits are available. Extraction methods need to be evaluated for their efficiency, cost, and side effects such as DNA degradation during extraction.

Methodology/principal findings: From individual western corn rootworm beetles, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, DNA extractions by the SDS method, CTAB method, DNAzol reagent, Puregene solutions and DNeasy column were compared in terms of DNA quantity and quality, cost of materials, and time consumed. Although all five methods resulted in acceptable DNA concentrations and absorbance ratios, the SDS and CTAB methods resulted in higher DNA yield (ng DNA vs. mg tissue) at much lower cost and less degradation as revealed on agarose gels. The DNeasy kit was most time-efficient but was the costliest among the methods tested. The effects of ethanol volume, temperature and incubation time on precipitation of DNA were also investigated. The DNA samples obtained by the five methods were tested in PCR for six microsatellites located in various positions of the beetle's genome, and all samples showed successful amplifications.

Conclusion/significance: These evaluations provide a guide for choosing methods of DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles based on expected DNA yield and quality, extraction time, cost, and waste control. The extraction conditions for this mid-size insect were optimized. The DNA extracted by the five methods was suitable for further molecular applications such as PCR and sequencing by synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. DNA electrophoresis on 0.5% agarose gel at 45 volts for 2 hrs.
GeneRuler™1 kb Plus DNA markers (M, in bp) and typical DNA samples isolated by SDS (1), CTAB (2), DNAzol® (3), Puregene® (4) and DNeasy® (5).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Main effects plot of ethanol volume and temperature on DNA yield rate resulted from precipitation.
The horizontal reference line is drawn at the overall mean of DNA yield rate. The dots display the response means for each factor level. The effects are the differences between the means and the reference line.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Milligan BG. Total DNA isolation. In: Hoelzel AR, editor. Oxford, , New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 29–64. Molecular Genetic Analysis of Population: A Practical Approach, 2nd Edition.
    1. Waldschmidt AM. Extraction of genomic DNA from Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponinae). Braz J Genet. 1997;20:421–423.
    1. Chen M, Zhu Y, Tao J, Luo Y. Methodological comparison of DNA extraction from Holcocerrus hippophaecolus (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) for AFLP analysis. For Study China. 2008;10:189–192.
    1. Chomczynski P, Mackey K, Drews R, Wilfinger W. DNAzol: A reagent for the rapid isolation of genomic DNA. BioTechniques. 1997;22:550–553. - PubMed
    1. Chomczynski P, Wilfinger W, Mackey K. Isolation of Genomic DNA from Human, Animal, and Plant Samples with DNAzol Reagents. Biotechnol Int. 1998:185–188.

Publication types