Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;25(12):1356-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1482-y. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

Massachusetts health reform and disparities in coverage, access and health status

Jane Zhu  1 , Phyllis Brawarsky, Stuart Lipsitz, Haiden Huskamp, Jennifer S Haas
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Massachusetts health reform and disparities in coverage, access and health status

Jane Zhu et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Massachusetts health reform has achieved near-universal insurance coverage, yet little is known about the effects of this legislation on disparities.

Objective: Since racial/ethnic minorities and low-income individuals are over-represented among the uninsured, we assessed the effects of health reform on disparities.

Design: Cross-sectional survey data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), 2006-2008.

Participants: Adults from Massachusetts (n = 36,505) and other New England states (n = 63,263).

Main measures: Self-reported health coverage, inability to obtain care due to cost, access to a personal doctor, and health status. To control for trends unrelated to reform, we compared adults in Massachusetts to those in all other New England states using multivariate logistic regression models to calculate adjusted predicted probabilities.

Key results: Overall, the adjusted predicted probability of health coverage in Massachusetts rose from 94.7% in 2006 to 97.7% in 2008, whereas coverage in New England remained around 92% (p < 0.001 for difference-in-difference). While cost-related barriers were reduced in Massachusetts, there were no improvements in access to a personal doctor or health status. Although there were improvements in coverage and cost-related barriers for some disadvantaged groups relative to trends in New England, there was no narrowing of disparities in large part because of comparable or larger improvements among whites and the non-poor.

Conclusions: Achieving equity in health and health care may require additional focused intervention beyond health reform.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Steinbrook R. Health care reform in Massachusetts–expanding coverage, escalating costs. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(26):2757–2760. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0804277. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonough JE, Rosman B, Butt M, Tucker L, Howe LK. Massachusetts health reform implementation: major progress and future challenges. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27(4):w285–297. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.w285. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonough JE, Rosman B, Phelps F, Shannon M. The third wave of Massachusetts health care access reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25(6):w420–431. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w420. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health Care in Massachusetts. Key Indicators. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy (assessed July 21, 2010 at http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dhcfp/r/pubs/09/key_indicators_02-09.pdf).
    1. Long SK, Stockley K. Health insurance coverage and access to care in Massachusetts: detailed tabulations based on the 2008 Massachusetts Health Insurance Survey (assessed July 21, 2010 at http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dhcfp/r/survey/08his_detailed_tabulatio...).

Publication types

MeSH terms