Is the transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads more hazardous than that of pacemaker leads?
- PMID: 20730717
Is the transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads more hazardous than that of pacemaker leads?
Abstract
Background: Leads used for low-voltage and high-voltage therapy delivered by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) differ from low-voltage pacemaker (PM) leads in their diameter and complexity of structure. Although there are reports showing that the extraction of ICD leads may be hazardous, due to firm adhesions to the vascular and chamber walls of high-voltage therapy coils, clinical evidence suggests that such procedures are safe.
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of transvenous extraction of ICD and PM leads in patients enrolled in a single tertiary centre.
Methods: We compared the results of lead extraction procedures in 345 patients with PM and in 79 patients submitted for the lead removal including at least one ICD lead. We analysed ingrown leads i.e. over 12 month-old PM leads and over 6 month-old ICD leads, which were removed using Cook's device.
Results: Patients in the two groups differed significantly in age and gender. The ICD systems were significantly younger, less complex (fewer leads per patient) and presented higher efficacy of extraction and fewer technical difficulties. The number of major complications was similar to the encountered during extraction of PM leads. However, minor complications were significantly more frequent in the ICD group.
Conclusions: 1. Extraction of ICD and PM leads is associated with a similar risk for developing major complications, however minor complications are more often during extraction of ICD leads. 2. A larger number of double coil leads may be the cause of complications despite a shorter time period elapsing from ICD implantation. 3. A probable cause of complications during ICD lead extraction is the pronounced growth of the connective tissue around the coils. However, further studies are required to clarify this phenomenon. 4. The success rate of ICD leads extraction using our own surgical technique is similar to that reported by other investigators using laser systems.
Comment in
-
[Transvenous extraction of cardioverter-defibrillator leads and pacemaker leads as a challenge in interventional cardiology in the coming decade].Kardiol Pol. 2010 Aug;68(8):891-2. Kardiol Pol. 2010. PMID: 20730718 Polish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in patients under or over 80 years of age.Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(2):130-5. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0005. Kardiol Pol. 2013. PMID: 23575705
-
Late complications of electrotherapy - a clinical analysis of indications for transvenous removal of endocardial leads: a single centre experience.Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(4):366-72. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0064. Kardiol Pol. 2013. PMID: 23788342
-
Laser-assisted extraction of pacemaker and defibrillator leads: the role of the cardiac surgeon.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1446-50; discussion 1450-1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.015. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19379883
-
Extraction of transvenous pacing and ICD leads.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):736-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01079.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008. PMID: 18507548 Review.
-
Extraction of cardiac rhythm devices: indications, techniques and outcomes for the removal of pacemaker and defibrillator leads.Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Jul;64(8):1140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02338.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20642712 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 10;19(10):5803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105803. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35627340 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of 1051 ICD Leads Extractions in Search of Factors Affecting Procedure Difficulty and Complications: Number of Coils, Tip Fixation and Position-Does It Matter?J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 23;13(5):1261. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051261. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592112 Free PMC article.
-
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22231644 Review.
-
A Questionable Indication For ICD Extraction After Successful VT Ablation.J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Apr 30;7(6):1172. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1172. eCollection 2015 Apr-May. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015. PMID: 27957158 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Apr;13(4):221-9. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.207. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26822723 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical