Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition
- PMID: 20731524
- DOI: 10.1037/a0019948
Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition
Abstract
When two targets (T1 and T2) are embedded in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), T2 is often missed (attentional blink, AB) if T2 follows T1 by less than 500 ms. Some have proposed that inhibition of a distractor following T1 contributes to the AB, but no direct evidence supports this proposal. This study examined distractor inhibition by assessing a distractor devaluation effect where inhibited items were evaluated less positively than controls. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a distractor presented just after T1 was evaluated less favorably when T2 was misidentified, independently of stimulus characteristics. Experiment 3 produced distractor devaluation in T2 incorrect trials when the evaluated distractor was the second item after T1. In contrast, a distractor presented before T1 was not devaluated (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 demonstrated that participants could not recognize presented distractors after an RSVP task, rejecting the possibility that memorized distractors were devalued. Results show a relationship between the devaluation of distractors following T1 and the AB, providing the first direct evidence of the distractor inhibition during the AB.
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
On the role of intervening distractors in the attentional blink.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jan;73(1):42-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0003-8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21258908
-
Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2489-501. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0207-6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21901571
-
Differential contributions of the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobe to attentional blink: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):247-56. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21426. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20044899
-
A conceptual and methodological framework for measuring and modulating the attentional blink.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Aug;74(6):1080-97. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0338-4. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22821263 Review.
-
The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1683-700. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1683. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009. PMID: 19933555 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 26;3:575. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00575. eCollection 2012. Front Psychol. 2012. PMID: 23272002 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 3;8(6):e66185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066185. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23755299 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Contributions of GABA Concentration in Frontal and Parietal Regions to Individual Differences in Attentional Blink.J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 24;36(34):8895-901. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0764-16.2016. J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27559171 Free PMC article.
-
Appraisal of space words and allocation of emotion words in bodily space.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e81688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081688. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24349112 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley.Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 13;6:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00249. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25821439 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources