Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Aug 23:341:c3995.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3995.

Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher E Clark  1 , Lindsay F P Smith, Rod S Taylor, John L Campbell
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher E Clark et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review trials of nurse led interventions for hypertension in primary care to clarify the evidence base, establish whether nurse prescribing is an important intervention, and identify areas requiring further study.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, British Nursing Index, Cinahl, Embase, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database.

Study selection: Randomised controlled trials of nursing interventions for hypertension compared with usual care in adults.

Data extraction: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, percentages reaching target blood pressure, and percentages taking antihypertensive drugs. Intervention effects were calculated as relative risks or weighted mean differences, as appropriate, and sensitivity analysis by study quality was undertaken.

Data synthesis: Compared with usual care, interventions that included a stepped treatment algorithm showed greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference -8.2 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -11.5 to -4.9), nurse prescribing showed greater reductions in blood pressure (systolic -8.9 mm Hg, -12.5 to -5.3 and diastolic -4.0 mm Hg, -5.3 to -2.7), telephone monitoring showed higher achievement of blood pressure targets (relative risk 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.43), and community monitoring showed greater reductions in blood pressure (weighted mean difference, systolic -4.8 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -7.0 to -2.7 and diastolic -3.5 mm Hg, -4.5 to -2.5).

Conclusions: Nurse led interventions for hypertension require an algorithm to structure care. Evidence was found of improved outcomes with nurse prescribers from non-UK healthcare settings. Good quality evidence from UK primary health care is insufficient to support widespread employment of nurses in the management of hypertension within such healthcare systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any company for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any companies that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Flow of papers through study
None
Fig 2 Change in systolic blood pressure with nurse led use of algorithm compared with usual care
None
Fig 3 Changes in blood pressure with interventions including nurse prescribing compared with usual care
None
Fig 4 Absolute systolic blood pressure after nurse led telephone monitoring compared with usual care
None
Fig 5 Absolute systolic blood pressure after community nurse led interventions compared with usual care for good quality studies
None
Fig 6 Changes in blood pressure with primary care nurse led clinics compared with usual care
None
Fig 7 Systolic blood pressure readings for participants from ethnic minority groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoom S, Murray CJL, and the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002;360:1347-60. - PubMed
    1. National Centre for Social Research. Health survey for England 2003. Department of Health, 2004.
    1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005;365:217-23. - PubMed
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42:1206-52. - PubMed
    1. Inkster M, Montgomery A, Donnan P, MacDonald T, Sullivan F, Fahey T. Organisational factors in relation to control of blood pressure: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:931-7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types