What are possible barriers and facilitators to implementation of a Participatory Ergonomics programme?
- PMID: 20735822
- PMCID: PMC2936443
- DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-64
What are possible barriers and facilitators to implementation of a Participatory Ergonomics programme?
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are common among workers. Participatory Ergonomics (PE) is used as an implementation strategy to prevent these symptoms. By following the steps of PE, working groups composed and prioritised ergonomic measures, and developed an implementation plan. Working group members were responsible to implement the ergonomic measures in their departments. Little is known about factors that hamper (barriers) or enhance (facilitators) the implementation of ergonomic measures. This study aimed to identify and understand the possible barriers and facilitators that were perceived during implementation.
Methods: This study is embedded in a cluster randomised controlled trial that investigated the effectiveness of PE to prevent LBP and NP among workers. For the purpose of the current study, questionnaires were sent to 81 working group members. Their answers were used to make a first inventory of possible barriers and facilitators to implementation. Based on the questionnaire information, 15 semi-structured interviews were held to explore the barriers and facilitators in more detail. All interviews were audio taped, transcribed verbatim, and analysed according to a systematic approach.
Results: All possible barriers and facilitators were obtained from questionnaire data, indicating that the semi-structured interviews did not yield information about new factors. Various barriers and facilitators were experienced. The presence of implementation plans for ergonomic measures that were already approved by the management facilitated implementation before the working group meeting. In these cases, PE served as a strategy to improve the implementation of the approved measures. Furthermore, the findings showed that the composition of a working group (i.e., including decision makers and a worker who led the implementation process) was important. Moreover, stakeholder involvement and collaboration were reported to considerably improve implementation.
Conclusions: This study showed that the working group as well as stakeholder involvement and collaboration were important facilitating factors. Moreover, PE was used as a strategy to improve the implementation of existing ergonomic measures. The results can be used to improve PE programmes, and thereby may contribute to the prevention of LBP and NP.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN27472278.
Similar articles
-
Process evaluation of a participatory ergonomics programme to prevent low back pain and neck pain among workers.Implement Sci. 2010 Aug 24;5:65. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-65. Implement Sci. 2010. PMID: 20735823 Free PMC article.
-
Stay@Work: Participatory Ergonomics to prevent low back and neck pain among workers: design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 29;9:145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-145. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008. PMID: 18959799 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics programme to prevent low back and neck pain.Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2315-20. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0458-2315. Work. 2012. PMID: 22317061 Clinical Trial.
-
Determinants of the de-implementation of low-value care: a multi-method study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07827-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35387673 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to patient uptake and utilisation of digital interventions for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e038800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038800. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33310794 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects on musculoskeletal pain, work ability and sickness absence in a 1-year randomised controlled trial among cleaners.BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 1;11:840. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-840. BMC Public Health. 2011. PMID: 22044549 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Digital Human Modeling in the Occupational Safety and Health Process: An Application in Manufacturing.IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2018;6(2):64-75. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2018.1491430. Epub 2018 Oct 16. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2018. PMID: 30984907 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the health of workers with a low socioeconomic position: Intervention Mapping as a useful method for adaptation of the Participatory Approach.BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09028-2. BMC Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32560709 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Impact on Pain Perceptions, Pain Intensity, and Physical Activity of a Mobile App to Empower Employees With Musculoskeletal Pain: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 27;9:e67886. doi: 10.2196/67886. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40577717 Free PMC article.
-
Guidance strategies for a participatory ergonomic intervention to increase the use of ergonomic measures of workers in construction companies: a study design of a randomised trial.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Apr 17;15:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-132. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014. PMID: 24742300 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, FA CS, Haldeman S, Nordin M, Hurwitz EL, Guzman J, Peloso PM. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:S60–S74. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous