Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Aug 24:10:457.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-457.

Thymostimulin versus placebo for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III clinical trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Thymostimulin versus placebo for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III clinical trial

Matthias M Dollinger et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro and palliative efficacy in advanced HCC in two independent phase II trials. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of thymostimulin in a phase III trial.

Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical phase III trial. Between 10/2002 and 03/2005, 135 patients with locally advanced or metastasised HCC (Karnofsky >or=60%/Child-Pugh <or= 12) were randomised to receive thymostimulin 75 mg s.c. 5x/week or placebo stratified according to liver function. Primary endpoint was twelve-month survival, secondary endpoints overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), tumor response, safety and quality of life. A subgroup analysis according to liver function, KPS and tumor stage (Okuda, CLIP and BCLC) formed part of the protocol.

Results: Twelve-month survival was 28% [95%CI 17-41; treatment] and 32% [95%CI 19-44; control] with no significant differences in median OS (5.0 [95% CI 3.7-6.3] vs. 5.2 [95% CI 3.5-6.9] months; p = 0.87, HR = 1.04 [95% CI 0.7-1.6]) or TTP (5.3 [95%CI 2.0-8.6] vs. 2.9 [95%CI 2.6-3.1] months; p = 0.60, HR = 1.13 [95% CI 0.7-1.8]). Adjustment for liver function, Karnofsky status or tumor stage did not affect results. While quality of life was similar in both groups, fewer patients on thymostimulin suffered from accumulating ascites and renal failure.

Conclusions: In our phase III trial, we found no evidence of any benefit to thymostimulin in the treatment of advanced HCC and there is therefore no justification for its use as single-agent treatment. The effect of thymostimulin on hepato-renal function requires further confirmation.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64487365.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic presentation of the study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of the phase III trial according to CONSORT guidelines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimate of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier graph showing probability of overall survival over time in percentage of patients randomised (- survival function, + censored): A) all patients; B) subgroup analysis Child A patients; C) subgroup analysis BCLC B patients; D) subgroup analysis BCLC C patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimate of time to progression. Kaplan-Meier graph showing time to progression in percentage of patients randomised (- survival function, + censored): A) all patients; B) subgroup analysis Child A patients; C) subgroup analysis BCLC B patients; D) subgroup analysis BCLC C patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Díaz M. et al.Primary liver cancer: Worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;10:S5–S16. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burroughs A, Hochhauser D, Meyer T. Systemic treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: two ends of the therapeutic spectrum. Lancet Oncol. 2004;10:409–418. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01508-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaugrand M, N'kontchou G, Seror O. et al.Local/regional and systemic treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;10:201–211. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871199. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;10:519–524. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.32089. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleig WE, Lesske J. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Primary and secondary prophylaxis as well as medical therapy. Chir Gastroenterol. 2003;10:247–252. doi: 10.1159/000074010. - DOI

MeSH terms

Associated data