Team working in intensive care: current evidence and future endeavors
- PMID: 20736827
- DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833e9731
Team working in intensive care: current evidence and future endeavors
Abstract
Purpose of review: It has recently been argued that the future of intensive care medicine will rely on high quality management and teamwork. Therefore, this review takes an organizational psychology perspective to examine the most recent research on the relationship between teamwork, care processes, and patient outcomes in intensive care.
Recent findings: Interdisciplinary communication within a team is crucial for the development of negotiated shared treatment goals and short-team patient outcomes. Interventions for maximizing team communication have received substantial interest in recent literature. Intensive care coordination is not a linear process, and intensive care teams often fail to discuss how to implement goals, trigger and align activities, or reflect on their performance. Despite a move toward interdisciplinary team working, clinical decision-making is still problematic and continues to be perceived as a top-down and authoritative process. The topic of team leadership in intensive care is underexplored and requires further research.
Summary: Based on findings from the most recent research evidence in medicine and management, four principles are identified for improving the effectiveness of team working in intensive care: engender professional efficacy, create stable teams and leaders, develop trust and participative safety, and enable frequent team reflexivity.
Similar articles
-
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009. PMID: 19032571 Review.
-
Team leadership in the intensive care unit: the perspective of specialists.Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1683-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a4c7. Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21460708
-
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x. J Clin Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16968430
-
Interprofessional collaboration in the ICU: how to define?Nurs Crit Care. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00398.x. Nurs Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21199549
-
Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare.Postgrad Med J. 2014 Mar;90(1061):149-54. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131168. Epub 2014 Jan 7. Postgrad Med J. 2014. PMID: 24398594 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions of Quality of Interprofessional Collaboration, Staff Well-Being and Nonbeneficial Treatment: A Comparison between Nurses and Physicians in Intensive and Palliative Care.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(6):602. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060602. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38540566 Free PMC article.
-
Variables associated with work performance in multidisciplinary mental health teams.SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jul 11;5:2050312117719093. doi: 10.1177/2050312117719093. eCollection 2017. SAGE Open Med. 2017. PMID: 28839935 Free PMC article.
-
Struggling for a feasible tool - the process of implementing a clinical pathway in intensive care: a grounded theory study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3629-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30400985 Free PMC article.
-
Time to look beyond one-year mortality in critically ill hematological patients?Crit Care. 2014 Feb 11;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/cc13722. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24517551 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing archetypes of organizational culture based on the Competing Values Framework: the experimental use of the framework in Japanese neonatal intensive care units.Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):384-391. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx038. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017. PMID: 28371865 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials