Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 28;4(9):4971-8.
doi: 10.1021/nn100560p.

Biological evaluation of pH-responsive polymer-caged nanobins for breast cancer therapy

Affiliations

Biological evaluation of pH-responsive polymer-caged nanobins for breast cancer therapy

Sang-Min Lee et al. ACS Nano. .

Abstract

A series of doxorubicin-loaded polymer-caged nanobins (PCN(DXR)) were evaluated in vivo in a murine MDA-MB-231 xenograft model of triple-negative breast cancer. The cross-linked polymer cage in PCN(DXR) offers protection for the drug payload while serving as a pH-responsive trigger that enhances drug release in the acidic environments commonly seen in solid tumors and endosomes. Varying the degree of cross-linking in the polymer cage allows the surface potential of PCN(DXR), and thus the in vivo circulation lifetime of the nanocarriers, to be tuned in a facile fashion. Given these design advantages, the present study provides the first in vivo evidence that PCN(DXR) can effectively inhibit tumor growth in a murine model of breast cancer. Importantly, PCN(DXR) was well-tolerated by mice, and drug encapsulation attenuated the toxicity of free doxorubicin. Taken together, this study demonstrates the potential utility of the PCN platform in cancer therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Schematic drawing of click-modifiable, DXR-encapsulated polymer-caged nanobins (PCNDXR). (B) Schematic drawing of the proposed acid-triggered drug release mechanism. (C-D) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of (C) intact PCNs at pH 7.4 and (D) PCNs after 72 h-incubation in pH 5.0-buffered solution at 37 °C. Both samples are stained with aqueous uranyl acetate (4 wt%) for TEM measurements.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Zeta potentials (ζ) of doxorubicin-loaded bare liposome (BLDXR) and polymer-caged nanobin (PCNDXR) with 0, 30, 50, and 70% degree of cross-linking (points, mean ζ; error bars, standard deviation). (B) Hydrodynamic diameters of BLDXR and PCNDXR (50% cross-linked) measured by dynamic light scattering (points, mean population; error bars, standard deviation). (C) Cumulative amount of DXR released from PCNDXR (50% cross-linked) and BLDXR at 37 °C in fetal bovine serum (FBS) and buffered saline (pH 6.0 and 5.0) (points, mean value; error bars, standard deviation). (D) Standard deviation (SD, σ) for the diameters of BLDXR and PCNDXR (50% cross-linked) incubated at pH 7.4 (points, mean value; error bars, standard deviation).
Figure 3
Figure 3
In vitro cytotoxicity of DXR-encapsulated polymer-caged nanobins (PCNDXR), empty PCN vehicles, or free DXR against (A) MDA-MB-231 and (B) HeLa cells during 48-h (open symbols) and 72-h (closed symbols) incubations. The concentration of the empty PCN vehicle was equivalent to the lipid concentration in the PCNDXR (points, mean viability; error bars, standard deviation).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell death induced by PCNDXR, was measured by Annexin-V/DAPI staining. In each panel, the lower-left (Annexin-V, DAPI), lower-right (Annexin-V+, DAPI-), and upper-right (Annexin-V+, DAPI+) quadrants represent the populations of live cells, apoptotic cells, and necrotic/dead cells, respectively. The average %-population in each quadrant is indicated by the numbers at the corners of the panels. This data show that non-transformed MCF-10A breast epithelial cells stably expressing empty vector (i.e., control cells) were less sensitive than MCF-10A cells stably transduced with the H-RasV12 oncogene (i.e., cancerous cells) to PCNDXR-induced apoptosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In vivo antitumor effects of PCNDXR, empty PCNs, or free DXR as administered by intraperitoneal injection to female nude mice bearing MDA-MB-231 human triple negative mammary tumors (n = 3 mice with bilateral tumors, 6 tumors per group). (A) Mean tumor volume. Pairwise tests were performed to assess statistical significance and were Bonferroni-corrected; * indicates p < 0.05 for PCNDXR compared with empty PCNs. PCNDXR was also significantly different from free DXR on weeks 1.5 and 2.5 (not shown in plot). Times of treatments are indicated by arrows (points, raw mean; error bars, standard error). (B) Body weights of each treatment group (points, mean; error bars, standard error).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Non-invasive fluorescent imaging of nude mice with mCherry-labeled MDA-MB-231 mammary tumors treated with empty PCNs, free DXR, or PCNDXR (scale bar = 1 cm). mCherry fluorescence is pseudo-colored and overlaid over bright-field images. All members in each group are shown (n = 3 mice and 6 tumors).
Figure 7
Figure 7
In vivo antitumor effects of PCNDXR (2.0, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/kg of DXR) administered by intraperitoneal injection to female nude mice bearing MDA-MB-231 mammary tumors (n = 3 mice with bilateral tumors, 6 tumors per group). (A) Mean tumor volume. Pairwise tests were performed to assess statistical significance and were Bonferroni-corrected; * indicates p < 0.05 for PCNDXR doses 5.0 and 7.5 mg DXR/kg compared with PBS (points, raw mean; error bars, standard error). PCNDXR at 2.0 mg DXR/kg dose was also statistically different on days 12 and 15 (not shown in plot). (B) Body weights of mice in each treatment group (points, mean; error bars, standard error).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream. Science. 2004;303:1818–1822. - PubMed
    1. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, Farokhzad OC, Margalit R, Langer R. Nanocarriers as an Emerging Platform for Cancer Therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:751–760. - PubMed
    1. Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin DM. Nanoparticle Therapeutics: An Emerging Treatment Modality for Cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:771–782. - PubMed
    1. Drummond DC, Meyer O, Hong K, Kirpotin DB, Papahadjopoulos D. Optimizing Liposomes for Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Agents to Solid Tumors. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:691–744. - PubMed
    1. Waterhouse DN, Tardi PG, Mayer LD, Bally MB. A Comparison of Liposomal Formulations of Doxorubicin with Drug Administered in Free Form: Changing Toxicity Profiles. Drug Saf. 2001;24:903–920. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms