Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Dec:81 Suppl:S87-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.041. Epub 2010 Aug 23.

Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%

Affiliations
Review

Risky feelings: why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Emotion plays a strong role in the perception of risk information but is frequently underemphasized in the decision-making and communication literature. We sought to discuss and put into context several lines of research that have explored the links between emotion and risk perceptions.

Methods: In this article, we provide a focused, "state of the science" review of research revealing the ways that emotion, or affect, influences people's cancer-related decisions. We identify illustrative experimental research studies that demonstrate the role of affect in people's estimates of cancer risk, their decisions between different cancer treatments, their perceptions of the chance of cancer recurrence, and their reactions to different methods of presenting risk information.

Results: These studies show that people have strong affective reactions to cancer risk information and that the way risk information is presented often determines the emotional gist people take away from such communications.

Conclusion: Cancer researchers, educators and oncologists need to be aware that emotions are often more influential in decision making about cancer treatments and prevention behaviors than factual knowledge is.

Practice implications: Anticipating and assessing affective reactions is an essential step in the evaluation and improvement of cancer risk communications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest – None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancer worry by imagined prior cancer experience

References

    1. National Cancer Institute funds four Eenters of Excellence in Cancer Communications Research. National Cancer Institute; 2003. [September 18, 2009]; Available from: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/hcirb/ceccr/CECCR_Awards_Press_Announcem....
    1. Nicholson RA, Kreuter MW, Lapka C, Wellborn R, Clark EM, Sanders-Thompson V, et al. Unintended effects of emphasizing disparities in cancer communication to African-Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2946–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Derry HA, McClure JB, Stark A, et al. Communicating side effect risks in a tamoxifen prophylaxis decision aid: The debiasing influence of pictographs. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:209–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gray SW, O'Grady C, Karp L, Smith D, Schwartz JS, Hornik RC, et al. Risk information exposure and direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations among women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1303–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stryker JE, Fishman J, Emmons KM, Viswanath K, Stryker JE, Fishman J, Emmons KM, Viswanath K. Cancer risk communication in mainstream and ethnic newspapers. Prev Chronic Dis [serial on the Internet] 2009. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2009/jan/08_0006.htm. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types