Retardation of coronary artery disease in humans by the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine: results of the INTACT study (International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy)
- PMID: 2076392
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02018315
Retardation of coronary artery disease in humans by the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine: results of the INTACT study (International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy)
Abstract
Experimental studies have demonstrated a 30-50% reduction in the development of atheromatous lesions of the aorta in rabbits fed a diet rich in cholesterol when they were treated with nifedipine. Based on these favorable results, we designed a multicenter, placebo (PL)-controlled, randomized, double-blind study, to test the effect of 80 mg nifedipine (NIF) per day versus placebo on the progression of mild coronary artery disease (CAD) (further development of existing stenoses, especially formation of new stenoses and occlusions) over a duration of 3 years. Progression of CAD was assessed by coronary angiograms performed at entrance and at completion of the study, using a computer-assisted analysis system (CAAS) to quantitate various stenosis parameters (percent degree of stenosis and minimal stenosis diameter). Of the 425 patients enrolled, 348 (82%) underwent a second angiogram; 66 of them, however, terminated treatment prematurely after an average of 359 (placebo) and 467 days (nifedipine). A total of 282 patients (148 on placebo, 134 on nifedipine) completed the trial with full-length treatment. There were no differences between the two groups in the progression of the existing stenoses. Patients on nifedipine, however, demonstrated significantly fewer new lesions (stenoses greater than 20% or occlusions) than those on placebo: In the 282 patients undergoing the full-length treatment, there were 73 patients on placebo (49%) with 118 new lesions (0.8/patient) and 54 patients on nifedipine (40%) with 78 new lesions (0.58/patient), a difference of -27% (p = 0.031 by Cochran's linear trend test). The difference was greatest in the left anterior descending branch, with 28 patients on placebo developing 33 new lesions (0.22/patient), versus 16 patients on nifedipine with 18 new lesions (0.13/patient) (-40%; p = 0.045); and in the left circumflex branch, where 34 patients on placebo exhibited 39 new lesions (0.26/patient) versus 23 patients on nifedipine with 22 new lesions (0.16/patient) (-38%, p = 0.033). No differences were observed in the right coronary artery, the vessel with the highest number of existing and new lesions [PL] versus 0.27 [NIF] new lesions/patient) (-7.6%, p = 0.381). Hence, INTACT confirmed the previous experimental studies and demonstrates a significant reduction in newly formed coronary lesions in patients on nifedipine when compared with those on placebo, especially in the presence of early coronary artery disease.
Similar articles
-
Concept of an antiatherosclerotic efficacy of calcium entry blockers. INTACT Investigators.Eur J Epidemiol. 1992 May;8 Suppl 1:107-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00145361. Eur J Epidemiol. 1992. PMID: 1505647 Review.
-
International nifedipine trial on anti-atherosclerotic therapy (INTACT)--methodologic implications and results of a coronary angiographic follow-up study using computer-assisted film analysis.Int J Card Imaging. 1990-1991;6(2):117-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02398895. Int J Card Imaging. 1990. PMID: 2097305 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical application of quantitative coronary angiography using the CAAS system: preliminary results of the INTACT study (International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy).Int J Card Imaging. 1988;3(2-3):75-86. doi: 10.1007/BF01814880. Int J Card Imaging. 1988. PMID: 3049846 Clinical Trial.
-
Features of the angiographic evaluation of the INTACT study. International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990 Aug;4 Suppl 5:1037-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02018314. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990. PMID: 2076391 Clinical Trial.
-
Interventions that beneficially influence the evolution of coronary atherosclerosis. The case for calcium channel blockers.Circulation. 1992 Dec;86(6 Suppl):III111-6. Circulation. 1992. PMID: 1424044 Review.
Cited by
-
Concept of an antiatherosclerotic efficacy of calcium entry blockers. INTACT Investigators.Eur J Epidemiol. 1992 May;8 Suppl 1:107-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00145361. Eur J Epidemiol. 1992. PMID: 1505647 Review.
-
Gut Microbiome, Functional Food, Atherosclerosis, and Vascular Calcifications-Is There a Missing Link?Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 9;9(9):1913. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091913. Microorganisms. 2021. PMID: 34576810 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies concerning calcium antagonists.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996 Sep;10(4):409-12. doi: 10.1007/BF00051104. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996. PMID: 8924053
-
Coadministration of calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors--is a skeptic convinced?: a personal view.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995 Aug;9 Suppl 3:525-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00877864. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1995. PMID: 8562469 Review.
-
Pharmacological and Nutritional Modulation of Vascular Calcification.Nutrients. 2019 Dec 30;12(1):100. doi: 10.3390/nu12010100. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31905884 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous