Differences in the in vitro inhibitory and bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and penicillin G against Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Comparison of time-kill kinetic studies with MIC values
- PMID: 2076592
- DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(90)90023-o
Differences in the in vitro inhibitory and bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and penicillin G against Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Comparison of time-kill kinetic studies with MIC values
Abstract
Nineteen strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were used to determine the bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefoxitin, cefotetan, and penicillin G with time-kill kinetics studies. Each antimicrobial agent was tested at subinhibitory (1/2 X MIC), inhibitory (1 X MIC), and suprainhibitory (4 X MIC) concentrations. Penicillin G exhibited virtually no sustained bactericidal activity at any of the antimicrobial concentrations tested. At subinhibitory concentrations, ceftizoxime was considerably more bactericidal than cefoxitin or cefotetan: At 12 hr, ceftizoxime killed 89% of the inoculum, whereas cefoxitin and cefotetan killed 35% and 33% of the inoculum, respectively. At inhibitory concentrations, ceftizoxime was again more bactericidal than cefoxitin and cefotetan: At 12 hr, ceftizoxime killed 90% of the inoculum, whereas cefoxitin and cefotetan killed 78% and 73%, respectively. At suprainhibitory concentrations, all three antimicrobial agents showed comparable bactericidal activity at 12 and 24 hr. Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin had somewhat lower killing rates overall against test strains with high MICs (greater than or equal to 32) versus low MICs (less than or equal to 16). However, at subinhibitory concentrations, ceftizoxime killed the B. fragilis group strains with high or low MIC values more effectively than cefotetan killed strains with low MICs. At the highest antibiotic concentrations tested (4 X MIC), only slight differences were seen in the bactericidal activity of the three compounds, regardless of MICs.
Similar articles
-
Bactericidal activity of ceftizoxime, cefotetan, and clindamycin against cefoxitin-resistant strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Nov;28(5):701-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.5.701. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991. PMID: 1778873
-
Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991. PMID: 1797454
-
Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2361-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2361-2366.1988. J Clin Microbiol. 1988. PMID: 3235664 Free PMC article.
-
An update on the in vitro activity of ceftizoxime and other cephalosporin/cephamycin antimicrobial agents against clinically significant anaerobic bacteria.Clin Ther. 1990;12 Suppl C:3-12. Clin Ther. 1990. PMID: 2202509 Review.
-
In vitro susceptibility vs. in vivo efficacy of various antimicrobial agents against the Bacteroides fragilis group.Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Nov-Dec;13(6):1170-80. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.6.1170. Rev Infect Dis. 1991. PMID: 1775850 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources