Similar articles

• [The gnathometric evaluation of the effect of bionator in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusions].

  Cvitanic-Raickovic C, Rak D. Cvitanic-Raickovic C, et al. Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl. 1991;24(1):29-36. Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl. 1991. PMID: 1819297 Croatian.
• Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.

  Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT. Dolce C, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.046. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17920501 Clinical Trial.
• Correction of Class II, division 1, malocclusion with the use of an activator appliance: a case report.

  Kocadereli I. Kocadereli I. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jul;25(7):487-92. Quintessence Int. 1994. PMID: 7991770
• [Mandibular propulsion in the treatment of Class II division I by activators: comparison with growth predictions].

  Bonnefont R, Charron C. Bonnefont R, et al. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale. 1979 Jan;13(1):39-48. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale. 1979. PMID: 394264 Review. French. No abstract available.
• [Orthodontics in general practice 3. Angle Class II/1 malocclusion: one-phase treatment treatment preferred to two-phase treatment].

  Kuijpers MA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Kuijpers MA, et al. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2008 Jan;115(1):22-8. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2008. PMID: 18265733 Review. Dutch.