Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Jan-Feb;37(1):29-31.

Rectal administration of midazolam versus diazepam for preanesthetic sedation in children

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Rectal administration of midazolam versus diazepam for preanesthetic sedation in children

R Holm-Knudsen et al. Anesth Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Sixty children were included in the trial. Each subject received midazolam 0.4 mg/kg body weight of diazepam 0.75 mg/kg body weight rectally in a double-blind randomized order. The degree of sedation of the children was assessed on arrival in the operating unit and during the induction of anesthesia. Adequate sedation on arrival in the operating unit and during induction of anesthesia was obtained in 84% and 67%, respectively, following administration of midazolam compared with 80% and 70% in the diazepam group. No side effects were noted. It is concluded that rectally administered midazolam 0.4 mg/kg is comparable to diazepam 0.75 mg/kg with respect to preanesthetic sedation in children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1977 Sep;66(5):563-7 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1979 Aug;45(2):87-90 - PubMed
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1981 Apr;25(2):158-60 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Apr;55(4):289-96 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 May-Jun;34(3):252-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources