Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug 26;2(4):24.
doi: 10.1186/alzrt48.

Review of Alzheimer's disease scales: is there a need for a new multi-domain scale for therapy evaluation in medical practice?

Affiliations

Review of Alzheimer's disease scales: is there a need for a new multi-domain scale for therapy evaluation in medical practice?

Philippe Robert et al. Alzheimers Res Ther. .

Abstract

Introduction: The present review of Alzheimer's disease (AD) rating scales aims to outline the need for a new rating scale to be used in routine clinical practice for long-term medical care of AD patients. An ideal scale would be: 1) practical, easy and quick to administer for an experienced clinician; 2) validated for AD; 3) multi-domain: covering the AD-relevant areas of cognition, activities of daily living, behavior, communication/social interaction, and quality of life; 4) applicable to all AD severity stages; 5) able to monitor disease progression; and 6) sensitive to measure therapy effects.

Methods: The National Library of Medicines' MEDLINE database was searched for the years 1981 to September 2008, using a set of keywords aiming to select instruments which cover at least some of the requirements for an ideal practical AD scale for therapy evaluation. Measures for AD staging and screening tests were not considered for review.

Results: Of 1,902 articles resulting from the literature search, 68 relevant AD scales were identified. Most of them were scales that predominantly measure the severity of major dysfunctions in particular AD domains. Only five scales met some of the requirements for a practical multi-domain AD scale, but did not possess all required characteristics.

Conclusions: Despite the multitude of AD scales for various purposes, there remains a need for a new multi-domain and easy to administer AD scale for assessment of disease progression and response to therapy in daily medical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khachaturian ZS, Radebaugh TS, (Eds) Alzheimer's Disease: Cause(s), Diagnosis, Treatment, and Care. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1996.
    1. Geldmacher DS. Treatment guidelines for Alzheimer's disease: redefining perceptions in primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;9:113–121. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v09n0205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmitt FA, Wichems CH. A systematic review of assessment and treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8:158–169. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v08n0306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawton MP. In: The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly. Barren JE, Lubben JE, Rowe JC, Deutschman DE, editor. New York: Academic Press; 1991. A multidimensional view of quality of life; pp. 3–27.
    1. Guideline on medicinal products for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias (CPMP/EWP/553/95 Rev.1) http://www.emea.europa.eu