Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 11:2010:652612.
doi: 10.4061/2010/652612.

Impact of cognitive impairment on functional outcome in stroke

Affiliations

Impact of cognitive impairment on functional outcome in stroke

Nurdan Paker et al. Stroke Res Treat. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the cognitive impairment on functional status in patients with subacute stroke. Fifty-two patients with subacute stroke were included in the study. Mini mental state examination (MMSE) test was used for the evaluation of cognitive status. Patients were separated into two groups according to their cognitive functions. Functional follow-up parameters were activities of daily living (ADL), global recovery and ambulation status. All patients were evaluated on admission to rehabilitation unit, at discharge and 6 months after discharge. Forty-four patients were completed the study. Mean age was 66 and 57 years; disease duration on admission was 4,8 and 3,5 months in the cognitively impaired and normal groups, respectively. Significant improvement was found in terms of functional follow-up parameters in both groups at discharge (P < .05). Functional follow-up parameters did not show statistically significant difference between the groups. But community ambulation rate was higher in cognitively normal group at the sixth month visit. As a result of this study, inpatient rehabilitation was effective both cognitively normal and impaired subacute stroke patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Community ambulation rates of the patients.

References

    1. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grosso MG. Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 1998;8(4):228–234. - PubMed
    1. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Troisi E, et al. Aging and stroke rehabilitation. A case-comparison study. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2003;15(1-2):98–105. - PubMed
    1. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000;81(6):695–700. - PubMed
    1. Tur BS, Gursel YK, Yavuzer G, Kucukdeveci A, Arasil T. Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2003;26(4):271–277. - PubMed
    1. Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2006;38(2):113–117. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources