Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010:2010:651063.
doi: 10.1155/2010/651063. Epub 2009 Aug 23.

Consumption of Cross-Linked Resistant Starch (RS4(XL)) on Glucose and Insulin Responses in Humans

Affiliations

Consumption of Cross-Linked Resistant Starch (RS4(XL)) on Glucose and Insulin Responses in Humans

Enas K Al-Tamimi et al. J Nutr Metab. 2010.

Abstract

Objective. The objective was to compare the postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses to nutrition bars containing either cross-linked RS type 4 (RS4(XL)) or standard wheat starch in normoglycemic adults (n = 13; age = 27 +/- 5 years; BMI = 25 +/- 3 kg/m(2)). Methods. Volunteers completed three trials during which they consumed a glucose beverage (GLU), a puffed wheat control bar (PWB), and a bar containing cross-linked RS4 (RS4(XL)) matched for available carbohydrate content. Serial blood samples were collected over two hours and glucose and insulin concentrations were determined and the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was calculated. Results. The RS4(XL) peak glucose and insulin concentrations were lower than the GLU and PWB (P < .05). The iAUC for glucose and insulin were lower following ingestion of RS4 compared with the GLU and PWB trials. Conclusions. These data illustrate, for the first time, that directly substituting standard starch with RS4(XL), while matched for available carbohydrates, attenuated postprandial glucose and insulin levels in humans. It remains to be determined whether this response was due to the dietary fiber and/or resistant starch aspects of the RS4(XL) bar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction the glucose (a) and insulin (b) responses over two hours following the consumption of each (Glu, PWB, and RS4) treatment. Values represent each mean ± SE. A: significant difference with PWB; B: significant difference with RS4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 6th edition. U.S. Government Printing Office; 2005.
    1. Higgins JA. Resistant starch: metabolic effects and potential health benefits. Journal of AOAC International. 2004;87(3):761–768. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC. Resistant starches. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2000;16(2):178–183. - PubMed
    1. Zhou J, Martin RJ, Tulley RT, et al. Dietary resistant starch upregulates total GLP-1 and PYY in a sustained day-long manner through fermentation in rodents. American Journal of Physiology. 2008;295(5):E1160–E1166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. So P-W, Yu W-S, Kuo Y-T, et al. Impact of resistant starch on body fat patterning and central appetite regulation. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(12, article e1309) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources