Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 15;74(5):88.
doi: 10.5688/aj740588.

A blended learning approach to teaching basic pharmacokinetics and the significance of face-to-face interaction

Affiliations

A blended learning approach to teaching basic pharmacokinetics and the significance of face-to-face interaction

Andrea Edginton et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess pharmacy students' attitudes towards a blended-learning pharmacokinetics course.

Design: Narrated visual presentations and animations that illustrated kinetic processes and guided students through the use of software programs used for calculations were created. Other learning techniques used included online self-assessment quizzes, practice problem sets, and weekly face-to-face problem-solving tutorials.

Assessment: A precourse questionnaire to assess students' level of enthusiasm towards the blended-learning course and to solicit any concerns they had was administered at the beginning of the course. A postcourse questionnaire that included the same 4 Likert-scale items from the precourse questionnaire and follow-up open-ended questions was administered. Individual changes in level of enthusiasm were compared for individuals who completed both the precourse and postcourse questionnaire. Students' concerns about the blended method of learning had decreased postcourse while their enthusiasm for the benefits of blended learning had increased.

Conclusion: Students' initial concerns about the blended learning experience were focused on their ability to communicate with the instructor about the online components, but shifted to their own time management skills at the end of the course. Face-to-face interactions with each other and with the instructor were more highly rated than online interactions in this course.

Keywords: blended learning; interaction; pharmacokinetics; social presence; student questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Paired responses from the precourse (time 1) and postcourse (time 2) questionnaire regarding the level of enthusiasm for learning in a blended course environment, n=28.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Paired responses from the precourse (time 1) and postcourse (time 2) questionnaire regarding students' level of enthusiasm for interacting with course learning modules online, n=28.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Paired responses from the precourse (time 1) and postcourse (time 2) questionnaire regarding the level of enthusiasm for interacting with the instructor online through e-mail and discussion forums, n=28.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Paired responses from the precourse (time 1) and postcourse (time 2) questionnaire regarding the level of enthusiasm for interacting with the instructor in face-to-face problem solving sessions, n=28.

References

    1. Graham CR, editor. Blended Learning System: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. The Handbook of Blended Learning. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
    1. Albrecht B. Enriching Student Experience Through Blended Learning. Educause Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin, 12; 2006. Available from: http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0612.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2010.
    1. Dziuban CD, Hartman JL, Moskal PD. Blended Learning. Educause Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin, 7; 2004Available from: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2010.
    1. Bonk CJ, Olson TM, Wisher RA, Orvis KL. Learning from focus groups: an examination of blended learning. J Distance Educ. 2002;17(3):97–118.
    1. Demetriadis S, Pombortsis A. e-Lectures for flexible learning: a study on their learning efficiency. Educ Technol Soc. 2007;10(2):147–157.