Maternal body mass index and risk of testicular cancer in male offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 20800565
- PMCID: PMC3069655
- DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.006
Maternal body mass index and risk of testicular cancer in male offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To date a number of studies have examined the association between maternal weight and testicular cancer risk although results have been largely inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the nature of this association.
Methods: Search strategies were conducted in Ovid Medline (1950-2009), Embase (1980-2009), Web of Science (1970-2009), and CINAHL (1937-2009) using keywords for maternal weight (BMI) and testicular cancer.
Results: The literature search produced 1689 hits from which 63 papers were extracted. Only 7 studies met the pre-defined criteria. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) of testicular cancer in the highest reported category of maternal BMI compared with the moderate maternal BMI was 0.82 (0.65-1.02). The Cochran's Q P value was 0.82 and the corresponding I(2) was 0%, both indicating very little variability among studies. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) for testicular cancer risk in the lowest reported category of maternal BMI compared to a moderate maternal BMI category was 0.88 (0.65-1.20). The Cochran's Q P value was 0.05 and the corresponding I(2) was 54%, indicating evidence of statistical heterogeneity. The combined unadjusted OR (95% CI) of testicular cancer risk per unit increase in maternal BMI was 1.01 (0.97-1.06). The Cochran's Q test had a P value of 0.05 and the corresponding I(2) was 55% indicating evidence of statistical heterogeneity.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis, which included a small number of studies, showed that a higher maternal weight does not increase the risk of testicular cancer in male offspring. Though an inverse association between high maternal BMI and testicular cancer risk was detected, it was not statistically significant. Further primary studies with adjustment for appropriate confounders are required.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
-
- Akre O, Ekbom A. Similar at a glance, but not the same. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(6):1480. [comment to Michos et al 2007 paper] - PubMed
-
- Arroyo P, Avila-Rosas H, Fernandez V, Casanueva E, Galvan D. Parity and the prevalence of overweight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;48(3):269–272. - PubMed
-
- Bernstein L, Depue RH, Ross RK, Judd HL, Pike MC, Henderson BE. Higher maternal levels of free estradiol in first compared to second pregnancy: early gestational differences. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986;76:1035–1039. - PubMed
-
- Bray F. Do Testicular Seminoma and Nonseminoma Share the Same Etiology? Evidence from an Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Incidence Trends in Eight European Countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(4):652–658. - PubMed
-
- Brown JE, Kaye SA, Folsom AR. Parity-related weight change in women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16(9):627–631. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
