Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing
- PMID: 20802370
- PMCID: PMC2957190
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f24005
Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing
Abstract
Objective: This article reviews some of the potential benefits of preserving low-frequency residual hearing using a short-electrode cochlear implant. Both the status of the inner ear and acoustic characteristics of speech cues are important factors. How does the magnitude of the potential benefits depend on the candidacy criteria for implantation with a hearing-preservation electrode?
Background: Previous research has demonstrated that preserving residual hearing in cochlear implantation can provide significant advantages for the understanding of speech in background noise as well as for the aesthetic qualities of music and other sounds. Developing optimal candidacy guidelines for these devices is a current goal.
Methods: In a large group of patients with Hybrid (acoustic + electric) cochlear implant, performance in the recognition of speech in background of other talkers is measured and compared with patients with traditional long-electrode implant. In addition, a number of patient characteristics are compared to success with the short-electrode implant.
Results: Age and duration of hearing loss are found to be predictive factors for the success of the short-electrode approach.
Conclusion: Optimal criterion for candidacy for the use of the short-electrode versus a traditional long electrode can improve the outlook for patients with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15867642
-
Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):609-14. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318043014c. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17514064
-
Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.Ear Hear. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):e99-112. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000131. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25514796
-
[An overview of the studies on combined electric and acoustic stimulation of auditory system].Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Oct;26(5):1146-9. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19947508 Review. Chinese.
-
Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Oct 1;29(5):385-390. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000742. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 34354014 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach--Nucleus Hybrid S12 project.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1300-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2eba1. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 20802369 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implants: the hazards of unexpected success.CMAJ. 2012 Sep 4;184(12):1343-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111743. Epub 2012 Feb 21. CMAJ. 2012. PMID: 22353589 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
'Real-life' benefit of hearing preservation cochlear implantation in the paediatric population: a single-site case-control study.BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e067248. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067248. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37156582 Free PMC article.
-
On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;48(6):1097-116. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26443490 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients.Audiol Res. 2022 Aug 7;12(4):414-422. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12040042. Audiol Res. 2022. PMID: 36004950 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Liberman MC, Dodds LW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hearing Research. 1984;16:55–74. - PubMed
-
- Hogan C, Turner CW. High-frequency amplification: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104:432–441. - PubMed
-
- Ching T, Dillon H, Bryne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:1128–1140. - PubMed
-
- Vickers D, Moore BCJ, Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:1164–1175. - PubMed
-
- Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Normal hearing, hearing impaired and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:1111–1121. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical