Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
- PMID: 20804295
- DOI: 10.1037/a0020224
Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
Abstract
To examine whether interhemispheric transfer during foveal word recognition entails a discontinuity between the information presented to the left and right of fixation, we presented target words in such a way that participants fixated immediately left or right of an embedded word (as in gr*apple, bull*et) or in the middle of an embedded word (grapp*le, bu*llet). Categorization responses to target words were faster and more accurate in a congruent condition (in which the embedded word was associated with the same response; e.g., Does bullet refer to an item of clothing?) than in an incongruent condition (e.g., Does bullet refer to a type of animal?). However, the magnitude of this effect did not vary as a function of position of fixation, relative to the embedded word, as might be expected if information from the 2 visual fields was initially split over the cerebral hemispheres and integrated only late in the word identification process. Equivalent results were observed in Experiment 1 (long stimulus duration) and Experiment 2 (in which stimulus duration was 200 ms; i.e., less than the time required to initiate a refixation).
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(8):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.022. Epub 2005 Jan 16. Neuropsychologia. 2005. PMID: 15817170
-
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.007. Epub 2008 Feb 11. Cortex. 2009. PMID: 19231478
-
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):738-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013140. Neuropsychology. 2008. PMID: 18999347 Clinical Trial.
-
Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):353-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Aug 29. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 19720073 Review.
-
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967218 Review.
Cited by
-
Embedded word priming elicits enhanced fMRI responses in the visual word form area.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0208318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208318. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30629612 Free PMC article.
-
Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements.J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012;24(2):179-188. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.604028. Epub 2011 Oct 20. J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2012. PMID: 22900139 Free PMC article.
-
The Representations of Chinese Characters: Evidence from Sublexical Components.J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;42(1):135-144. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1057-21.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 15. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 34782438 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources