Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Sep 24;24(15):2381-90.
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833dfc68.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Graeme Meintjes et al. AIDS. .

Abstract

Objective: Paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) is a frequent complication of antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited countries. We aimed to assess whether a 4-week course of prednisone would reduce morbidity in patients with paradoxical TB-IRIS without excess adverse events.

Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prednisone (1.5 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks then 0.75 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks). Patients with immediately life-threatening TB-IRIS manifestations were excluded.

Methods: The primary combined endpoint was days of hospitalization and outpatient therapeutic procedures, which were counted as one hospital day.

Results: One hundred and ten participants were enrolled (55 to each arm). The primary combined endpoint was more frequent in the placebo than the prednisone arm {median hospital days 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-9] and 0 (IQR 0-3), respectively; P = 0.04}. There were significantly greater improvements in symptoms, Karnofsky score, and quality of life (MOS-HIV) in the prednisone vs. the placebo arm at 2 and 4 weeks, but not at later time points. Chest radiographs improved significantly more in the prednisone arm at weeks 2 (P = 0.002) and 4 (P = 0.02). Infections on study medication occurred in more participants in prednisone than in placebo arm (27 vs. 17, respectively; P = 0.05), but there was no difference in severe infections (2 vs. 4, respectively; P = 0.40). Isolates from 10 participants were found to be resistant to rifampicin after enrolment.

Conclusion: Prednisone reduced the need for hospitalization and therapeutic procedures and hastened improvements in symptoms, performance, and quality of life. It is important to investigate for drug-resistant tuberculosis and other causes for deterioration before administering glucocorticoids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. None of the authors has a potential conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Progress of participants through the trial
a Common alternative diagnoses were drug reaction (9), bacterial infection (8), cryptococcosis (4), diarrhoeal illness (4) and heart failure (4). b Among these 33 patients the most frequent immediately life threatening manifestation was neurological TB-IRIS (n=25).
Figure 2
Figure 2
a: Symptom score at week 2 and 4 The distribution of symptom scores in percentage at week 2 and 4 in 3 categories (deteriorated, no change, improved/resolved) is shown. Participants who switched to open label prednisone at or before week 2 were not scored at week 4 (they are shown in a separate category together with those who died within 2 weeks on the week 4 graph). There were significant differences between the 2 arms at week 2 (p=0.001) and week 4 (p=0.03). b: Chest radiograph score at week 2 and 4 Participants who had a pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph at baseline (week 0) had a chest radiograph score assigned at week 2 and 4 by 2 radiologists. Scores were allocated in 3 categories (deteriorated, no change, improved/resolved) in comparison with the week 0 chest radiograph. The distribution of scores in percentage is shown. There were significant differences between the 2 arms at week 2 (p=0.002) and week 4 (p=0.02).
Figure 2
Figure 2
a: Symptom score at week 2 and 4 The distribution of symptom scores in percentage at week 2 and 4 in 3 categories (deteriorated, no change, improved/resolved) is shown. Participants who switched to open label prednisone at or before week 2 were not scored at week 4 (they are shown in a separate category together with those who died within 2 weeks on the week 4 graph). There were significant differences between the 2 arms at week 2 (p=0.001) and week 4 (p=0.03). b: Chest radiograph score at week 2 and 4 Participants who had a pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph at baseline (week 0) had a chest radiograph score assigned at week 2 and 4 by 2 radiologists. Scores were allocated in 3 categories (deteriorated, no change, improved/resolved) in comparison with the week 0 chest radiograph. The distribution of scores in percentage is shown. There were significant differences between the 2 arms at week 2 (p=0.002) and week 4 (p=0.02).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Thirty-five participants were started on open label prednisone (20 in the placebo arm and 15 in the prednisone arm). This Kaplan-Meier graph demonstrates the differences in the time that open label prednisone was started between the two arms. In the first 4 weeks while participants were receiving study medication, 18 in the placebo arm (33%) vs 5 in the prednisone arm (9%) were switched to open label prednisone (p=0.002) because of significant symptom deterioration. After 4 weeks, 2 in the placebo arm (4%) vs 10 in the prednisone arm (18%) were started on open-label prednisone (p=0.01) mainly because of relapse of TB-IRIS symptoms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McIlleron H, Meintjes G, Burman WJ, Maartens G. Complications of antiretroviral therapy in patients with tuberculosis: drug interactions, toxicity, and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Infect Dis. 2007;196(Suppl 1):S63–75. - PubMed
    1. Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Scano F, Maartens G, French MA, Worodria W, et al. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case definitions for use in resource-limited settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:516–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn SD, Myer L, Bekker LG, Wood R. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution disease: incidence, risk factors and impact in an antiretroviral treatment service in South Africa. AIDS. 2007;21:335–341. - PubMed
    1. Bourgarit A, Carcelain G, Martinez V, Lascoux C, Delcey V, Gicquel B, et al. Explosion of tuberculin-specific Th1-responses induces immune restoration syndrome in tuberculosis and HIV co-infected patients. Aids. 2006;20:F1–7. - PubMed
    1. Meintjes G, Wilkinson KA, Rangaka MX, Skolimowska K, van Veen K, Abrahams M, et al. Type 1 helper T cells and FoxP3-positive T cells in HIV-tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:1083–1089. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data