Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;64(12):1379-85.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.179. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey

S Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: The European Union (EU)-funded project Food Labelling to Advance Better Education for Life (FLABEL) aims to understand how nutrition information on food labels affects consumers' dietary choices and shopping behaviour. The first phase of this study consisted of assessing the penetration of nutrition labelling and related information on various food products in all 27 EU Member States and Turkey.

Methods: In each country, food products were audited in three different types of retailers to cover as many different products as possible within five food and beverage categories: sweet biscuits, breakfast cereals, pre-packed chilled ready meals, carbonated soft drinks and yoghurts.

Results: More than 37 000 products were audited in a total of 84 retail stores. On average, 85% of the products contained back-of-pack (BOP) nutrition labelling or related information (from 70% in Slovenia to 97% in Ireland), versus 48% for front-of-pack (FOP) information (from 24% in Turkey to 82% in the UK). The most widespread format was the BOP tabular or linear listing of nutrition content. Guideline daily amounts labelling was the most prevalent form of FOP information, showing an average penetration of 25% across all products audited. Among categories, breakfast cereals showed the highest penetration of nutrition-related information, with 94% BOP penetration and 70% FOP penetration.

Conclusions: Nutrition labelling and related information was found on a large majority of products audited. These findings provide the basis for subsequent phases of FLABEL involving attention, reading, liking, understanding and use by consumers of different nutrition labelling formats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Penetration of nutrition labelling and related information across five product categories in EU-27 and Turkey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tabular/linear nutrition content information on the back of pack (BOP) across five product categories; Big 4=calories, carbohydrates, protein, fat; Big 8=Big 4 plus sugar, saturated fat, sodium and fibre.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Penetration of GDA information on the FOP and BOP across five product categories.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Penetration of nutrition claims on the FOP and BOP across five product categories.

References

    1. Brecher SJ, Bender MM, Wilkening VL, McCabe NM, Anderson EM. Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 Food Label and Package Survey. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:1057–1062. - PubMed
    1. Choices International Foundation 2007 ): http://www.choicesprogramme.org/en , accessed 9 July 2009.
    1. Cinar AB, Murtomaa H. A holistic food labelling strategy for preventing obesity and dental caries. Obes Rev. 2009;10:357–361. - PubMed
    1. Cowburn G, Stockley L. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:21–28. - PubMed
    1. EC Council Directive 90/496/EEC of 24 September 1990 on nutrition labelling for foodstuffs. OJ L. 1990;276:40–44.

Publication types