Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;469(2):382-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1500-8.

A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10 years

Affiliations

A monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup has no osteolysis on CT at 10 years

Todd C Moen et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Aseptic osteolysis has been the single most important factor limiting the longevity of a THA. A great deal of attention has been focused on the development of implants and materials that minimize the development of osteolysis. The monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup was designed to minimize osteolysis, but whether it does so is unclear.

Questions/purposes: We evaluated the incidence of osteolytic lesions after THA using a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular component.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 51 patients who had a THA using a monoblock porous tantalum acetabular cup. At a minimum of 9.6 years postoperatively (average, 10.3 years; SD, 0.2 years; range, 9.6-10.8 years), a helical CT scan of the pelvis using a metal suppression protocol was obtained. This scan was evaluated for the presence of osteolysis.

Results: We found no evidence of osteolysis on CT scan at an average of 10.3 years.

Conclusions: Osteolysis appears not to be a major problem at 10 years with this monoblock porous tantalum acetabular component, but longer term followup will be required to determine whether these findings persist.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 1A–C
(A) Axial, (B) coronal, and (C) sagittal views from a representative CT scan are shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC, Jr, Junick DW, White RE. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:476–483. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bankston AB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Ritter MA. Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty in patient-matched groups: a comparison of stainless steel, cobalt chrome, and titanium-bearing surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:315–322. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80095-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Lewis RJ, Unger AS, O’Keefe TJ, Christie MJ, Nasser S, Wood JE, Stulberg SD, Tanzer M. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(Suppl 2):123–129. - PubMed
    1. Bobyn JD, Toh KK, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:347–354. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90062-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christie MJ. Clinical applications of Trabecular Metal. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2002;31:219–220. - PubMed