Diabetes pharmacy management: balancing safety, cost, and outcomes
- PMID: 20809669
Diabetes pharmacy management: balancing safety, cost, and outcomes
Abstract
Medication nonadherence, clinical inertia, and contradictory clinical evidence on aggressive disease management contribute to poor outcomes in diabetes management, leading to increased healthcare utilization and costs. As plans increase their focus on the management of type 2 diabetes as an area of high healthcare resource utilization, the importance of appropriate antihyperglycemic agent selection is receiving more attention. The selection process is further complicated by the crowded diabetes drug category, which features several agents with diverse mechanisms of action and routes of administration. The choice of specific antihyperglycemic agents should be predicated on their effectiveness in lowering glucose levels, extraglycemic effects that may reduce long-term complications, safety profiles, tolerability, ease of use, and expense. Beyond appropriate drug selection, pharmacy benefit design also represents an important public health tool for improving treatment adherence and outcomes. Value-based benefit design, in particular, emphasizes high-value medical services by lowering patient copays to encourage plan member use. Essentially, this innovative form of benefit design dictates that the more clinically beneficial the therapy, the lower patients' cost share will be. Other interventions, such as motivational interviewing, pay-for-performance, and medication therapy management, are also being applied to improve treatment adherence and outcomes in the managed care environment, with varying levels of success. Regardless of the specific inventions applied at health plans for improving treatment success in type 2 diabetes, pharmacy director leadership and involvement can contribute to the success of these efforts.
Similar articles
-
The economic rationale for adherence in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Am J Manag Care. 2012 Apr;18(3 Suppl):S43-8. Am J Manag Care. 2012. PMID: 22558941 Review.
-
Economic and clinical impact of innovative pharmacy benefit designs in the management of diabetes pharmacotherapy.Am J Manag Care. 2007 Apr;13 Suppl 2:S55-8. Am J Manag Care. 2007. PMID: 17417934 Review.
-
Five features of value-based insurance design plans were associated with higher rates of medication adherence.Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Mar;33(3):493-501. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0060. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014. PMID: 24522551
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
-
Impact of clinical pharmacy services on outcomes and costs for indigent patients with diabetes.Am J Manag Care. 2016 Apr 1;22(4):e147-52. Am J Manag Care. 2016. PMID: 27143351
Cited by
-
Impact of delaying treatment intensification with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin: A longitudinal study of a US administrative claims database.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):831-839. doi: 10.1111/dom.13156. Epub 2017 Dec 4. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. PMID: 29119712 Free PMC article.
-
Glycaemic impact of treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antidiabetes drugs or basal insulin.Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018 Jun 11;1(3):e00019. doi: 10.1002/edm2.19. eCollection 2018 Jul. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018. PMID: 30815554 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials