Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 1:10:527.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-527.

Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region

Affiliations

Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region

Katrien Beeckman et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care has a positive effect on pregnancy, both clinically and psychologically, but consensus about the optimal number of antenatal visits is lacking. This study aims to provide insight into the dynamics of the number of antenatal visits a woman receives. Independent effects of predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants are examined.

Methods: Women were recruited in nine clinical centres in the Brussels Metropolitan region. Antenatal care use was measured prospectively. A Poisson regression model was applied to measure the independent effect of individual determinants on the number of antenatal visits.

Results: Data on antenatal care trajectories in 333 women were collected. The multivariate analyses showed that women with a Maghreb or Turkish origin had 14% fewer visits compared with European (EU15) women. More highly educated women had 22% more visits compared with those with a low education. Women with a high income had 14% more antenatal visits compared with those with a low income. Fewer antenatal visits were observed in multiparae (15%), women initiating care after 14 weeks of gestation (31%), women without medical risks during the pregnancy (12%) and in women with a continuity of care index of 50% or more (12%). More visits were observed in delivering after week 37 (22% increase).

Conclusions: Predisposing and enabling factors have to be considered when antenatal care programmes are evaluated in a metropolitan area. Variations in the number of antenatal visits show that socially vulnerable women are more at risk of having fewer visits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
outline of the behaviour model by Andersen and Newman [17], reflecting individual determinants included in the analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
recruitment scheme.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:306–316. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Provision of effective antenatal care. 2006. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/standards/effective_ante... 26-11-2008.
    1. World Health Organization. Report of a Technical Working Group. Antenatal Care. 1996. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/maternal_newborn.en.htm 26-11-2008.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Antenatal Care Randomized Trial: Manual for the Implementation of the New Model. 2001. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/RHR_01_30/index.html 26-11-2008.
    1. Dragonas T, Christodoulou GN. Prenatal care. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18:127–142. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00085-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types