Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 1:10:472.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-472.

MRS-guided HDR brachytherapy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in high risk localised prostate cancer

Affiliations

MRS-guided HDR brachytherapy boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in high risk localised prostate cancer

Aleksandra Kazi et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: It is known that the vast majority of prostate cancers are multifocal. However radical radiotherapy historically treats the whole gland rather than individual cancer foci.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can be used to non-invasively locate individual cancerous tumours in prostate. Thus an intentionally non-uniform dose distribution treating the dominant intraprostatic lesion to different dose levels than the remaining prostate can be delivered ensuring the maximum achievable tumour control probability.The aim of this study is to evaluate, using radiobiological means, the feasibility of a MRS-guided high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost to the dominant lesion.

Methods: Computed tomography and MR/MRS were performed for treatment planning of a high risk localised prostate cancer. Both were done without endorectal coil, which distorts shape of prostate during the exams.Three treatment plans were compared:- external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) only- combination of EBRT and HDR brachytherapy- combination of EBRT and HDR brachytherapy with a synchronous integrated boost to the dominant lesionThe criteria of plan comparison were: the minimum, maximum and average doses to the targets and organs at risk; dose volume histograms; biologically effective doses for organs at risk and tumour control probability for the target volumes consisting of the dominant lesion as detected by MR/MRS and the remaining prostate volume.

Results: Inclusion of MRS information on the location of dominant lesion allows a safe increase of the dose to the dominant lesion while dose to the remaining target can be even substantially decreased keeping the same, high tumour control probability. At the same time an improved urethra sparing was achieved comparing to the treatment plan using a combination of EBRT and uniform HDR brachytherapy.

Conclusions: MRS-guided HDR brachytherapy boost to dominant lesion has the potential to spare the normal tissue, especially urethra, while keeping the tumour control probability high.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Up: T2-weighted transverse MR image, with the MRSI grid and a color map corresponding to the choline/citrate ratio. Down: MRS spectra for respective voxels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Underlying MR image to the MRS spectra presented on figure 1A.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dose distributions for the following plans: conformal external beam plans where dose is relative to the prescription dose to the target (A); the HDR brachytherapy plan where the 100% isodose corresponds to 10Gy (B) and the SIB HDR brachytherapy plan where the 100% isodose corresponds to 7.5Gy (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for the conformal external beam plans where dose is relative to the prescription dose to the target (A), and for the HDR brachytherapy plans (B) delivering 10Gy to the whole prostate (dashed lines) and the SIB HDR brachytherapy plan (continuous lines). Table on Figure B. shows TCP values for the investigated treatment plans.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Hricak H, Narayan P, Carroll P, Nelson SJ. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. Radiology. 1996;198(3):795–805. - PubMed
    1. Kaji Y, Kurhanewicz J, Hricak H, Sokolov DL, Huang LR, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB. Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of postbiopsy changes on MR images: role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1998;206(3):785–90. - PubMed
    1. Terris MK. Prostate biopsy strategies: past, present, and future. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29(1):205–12. doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(02)00005-8. xi. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu KK, Scheidler J, Hricak H, Vigneron DB, Zaloudek CJ, Males RG, Nelson SJ, Carroll PR, Kurhanewicz J. Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1999;213(2):481–8. - PubMed
    1. Pickett B, Kurhanewicz J, Coakley F, Shinohara K, Fein B, Roach M. Use of MRI and spectroscopy in evaluation of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(4):1047–55. - PubMed

Publication types