Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2010 Apr;6(2):53-5.
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.65166.

Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature

Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature

Onkar Singh et al. J Minim Access Surg. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

We report two cases of retrocaval ureter that were successfully treated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach. Presentation of both these cases was with flank pain. Ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique was performed for one, and pyelopyelostomy for the other case. Operative time was 120 min and 110 min, respectively. Pyelopyelostomy was technically easier to perform than ureteroureterostomy that required an extra fourth port insertion to facilitate dissection. With increasing experience with the intracorporeal suturing laparoscopic technique of either pyelopyelostomy or ureteroureterostomy should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter.

Keywords: Retrocaval ureter; laparoscopy; pyelopyelostomy; ureteroureterostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Excretory urogram showing reverse-J deformity of right proximal ureter with dilatation, associated with right hydronephrosis
Figure 2
Figure 2
(Right) Laparoscopic transperitoneal dissection of retrocaval ureter; upper ureter (PU) can be seen as going posterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC) while distal segment of the ureter (DU) clearly seen as it emerges from posterior of IVC. (Left) The retrocaval portion of the ureter being excised.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(Right) Proximal (PU) and distal (DU) segments of right ureter held up to show its course, IVC can be clearly seen as hooked up between these segments. (Left) Pyelopyelostomy being performed, double-J stent is visible with its upper end inside the pelvis.

References

    1. Simforoosh N, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Tabibi A. Laparoscopic pyelopyelostomy for retrocaval ureter without excision of the retrocaval segment: First report of six cases. J Urol. 2006;175:2166–9. - PubMed
    1. Tobias-Machado M, Lasmar MT, Wroclawski ER. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery with extracorporeal ureteroureteral anastomosis for treating retrocaval ureter. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31:147–50. - PubMed
    1. Chung BI, Gill IS. Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty of a Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1433–6. - PubMed
    1. Ouyang CC, Chueh SC, Hsu TC, Chen J, Tsai TC, Chiu TY. Retrocaval ureter- three case reports and review of the literature. J Urol ROC. 1994;5:49–53.
    1. Baba S, Oya M, Miyahara M, Deguchi N, Tazaki H. Laparoscopic surgical correction of circumcaval ureter. Urology. 1994;44:122–6. - PubMed

Publication types