Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May-Jun;62(3):235-43.

[Adherence to a medical nutrition therapy program in pregnant women with diabetes, measured by three methods, and its association with glycemic control]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 20815129
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Adherence to a medical nutrition therapy program in pregnant women with diabetes, measured by three methods, and its association with glycemic control]

[Article in Spanish]
Margie Balas-Nakash et al. Rev Invest Clin. 2010 May-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The measurement of adherence to nutrition therapy is essential to evaluate if the outcomes are related to given recommendations.

Material and methods: The aim of this study was to describe adherence to a Medical Nutrition Therapy Program in Mexican pregnant women with diabetes, using three different methods; and evaluate its association with glycemic control. Adherence was measured with a questionnaire (0-100%), women's self-perception (0-100%) and energy intake adequacy by multiple pass 24 hour recall (85-115% of recommendation). Women were randomly assigned to two different dietary strategies. Glycemic control was determined by capillary glucose self-monitoring.

Results: Women analyzed in this study (n=69) had an age range of 22-42 years; 47.8% had type 2 diabetes (DM2) and 52.2% had gestational diabetes (GDM). Energy intake adequacy was higher in women with GDM (41.9% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.001). Average adherence measured with the questionnaire was 55%; no differences were found by type of diabetes. Self-perception was higher in women with DM2 (84%) when compared to women with GDM (70%) (p = 0.039). No differences were found in the three methods by study group. Optimal glycemic control was observed in 50% of women; no association was found with adherence measured with any of the three methods studied.

Conclusions: The observed differences in adherences suggest that it may be recommendable to combine different measurement methods and include social and psychological factors that affect behavioral change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types