Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings
- PMID: 20818812
- PMCID: PMC2937109
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4291
Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: correlation between computerized tomography and operative findings
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) to characterize the nature of peripancreatic collections.
Methods: Twenty five patients with peripancreatic collections on CECT and who underwent operative intervention for severe acute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. The collections were classified into (1) necrosis without frank pus; (2) necrosis with pus; and (3) fluid without necrosis. A blinded radiologist assessed the preoperative CTs of each patient for necrosis and peripancreatic fluid collections. Peripancreatic collections were described in terms of volume, location, number, heterogeneity, fluid attenuation, wall perceptibility, wall enhancement, presence of extraluminal gas, and vascular compromise.
Results: Fifty-four collections were identified at operation, of which 45 (83%) were identified on CECT. Of these, 25/26 (96%) had necrosis without pus, 16/19 (84%) had necrosis with pus, and 4/9 (44%) had fluid without necrosis. Among the study characteristics, fluid heterogeneity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the group with necrosis and pus, compared to the other two groups (94% vs 48% and 25%, P = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Among the wall characteristics, irregularity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the groups with necrosis with and without pus, when compared to the group with fluid without necrosis (88% and 71% vs 25%, P = 0.06 and P < 0.01, respectively). The combination of heterogeneity and presence of extraluminal gas had a specificity and positive likelihood ratio of 92% and 5.9, respectively, in detecting pus.
Conclusion: Most of the peripancreatic collections seen on CECT in patients with severe acute pancreatitis who require operative intervention contain necrotic tissue. CECT has a somewhat limited role in differentiating the different types of collections.
Figures


Comment in
-
Comments on the article about correlation between computerized tomography and surgery in acute pancreatitis.World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 21;17(3):407-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.407. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21253404 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Comments on the article about correlation between computerized tomography and surgery in acute pancreatitis.World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 21;17(3):407-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.407. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21253404 Free PMC article.
-
Revised Atlanta classification for CT pancreatic and peripancreatic collections in the first month of acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement.Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2302-2310. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5906-0. Epub 2019 Jan 10. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30631920
-
Early encapsulation of peripancreatic fluid/necrosis collections on imaging (CECT) in acute pancreatitis: influential factors and clinical significance for prognosis.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03145-7. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 38287237 Free PMC article.
-
Pancreatic fluid collections: What is the ideal imaging technique?World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 28;21(48):13403-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13403. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26730150 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Updated imaging nomenclature for acute pancreatitis.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):W464-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12222. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. PMID: 25341160 Review.
Cited by
-
Reporting of acute pancreatitis by radiologists-time for a systematic change with structured reporting template.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 May;45(5):1277-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02468-9. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020. PMID: 32189022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multidetector CT in emergency radiology: acute and generalized non-traumatic abdominal pain.Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150859. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150859. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26689097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 11;35(Suppl 1):S1-S44. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.24392. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39599919 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current trends in acute pancreatitis: Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 14;29(18):2747-2763. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2747. World J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37274068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comments on the article about correlation between computerized tomography and surgery in acute pancreatitis.World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan 21;17(3):407-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.407. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21253404 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Banks PA, Freeman ML. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2379–2400. - PubMed
-
- Lenhart DK, Balthazar EJ. MDCT of acute mild (nonnecrotizing) pancreatitis: abdominal complications and fate of fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:643–649. - PubMed
-
- Diculescu M, Ciocîrlan M, Ciocîrlan M, Stănescu D, Ciprut T, Marinescu T. Predictive factors for pseudocysts and peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2005;14:129–134. - PubMed
-
- Kourtesis G, Wilson SE, Williams RA. The clinical significance of fluid collections in acute pancreatitis. Am Surg. 1990;56:796–799. - PubMed
-
- Kivisaari L, Somer K, Standertskjold-Nordenstam CG, Schroder T, Kivilaakso E, Lempinen M. A new method for the diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic-necrotizing pancreatitis using contrast-enhanced CT. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:27–30. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials