Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey
- PMID: 20818837
- DOI: 10.2165/11538900-000000000-00000
Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey
Abstract
Background: Healthcare professionals have a responsibility to help each woman select the most appropriate hormonal contraceptive according to her personal preferences, needs and circumstances.
Objective: To assess attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences of hormonal contraceptive users.
Study design: A cross-sectional survey conducted through self-administered, online questionnaires. One questionnaire was administered in the US and another was administered in the UK, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Brazil, Australia and Russia (Eight-Country Survey questionnaire).
Participants: Current hormonal contraceptive users, aged 18-44 years, in the general community.
Results: Questionnaires were completed by 5120 women. The mean age of the respondents was approximately 31 years and over 70% were current contraceptive pill users. Many women did not plan on having children in the next 3 years (range 44% in Russia to 77% in the US and UK), but a quick return of fertility upon contraceptive discontinuation was desired by the majority of women in all countries (range 54% in the US to 91% in Russia). Rates of discontinuation or switching to a different hormonal contraceptive in the past year ranged from 30% in Germany to 81% in Brazil. Requests to switch because of side effects ranged from 24% in Spain to 57% in Brazil. Results from the Eight-Country Survey questionnaire indicated that 42% of women would consider using one of the most effective contraceptive methods even if their menstrual cycle changed, 58% would accept irregular bleeding initially if they had fewer periods over time, 53% did not want/had concerns about foreign/additional estrogen in their body, 85% would prefer a monthly option with a lower hormone dose over a daily pill, 80% would consider switching contraceptives to minimize estrogen exposure and 74% would prefer an estrogen-free/progestin (progesterone congener)-only pill to avoid potential side effects from foreign/extra estrogen. Oral contraceptive users across all countries admitted missing (range 39% in the UK to 65% in Brazil) or taking a pill at the wrong time (range 12% in Spain to 67% in Brazil) in the previous 3 months. Approximately 81% of all respondents said they would consider using a method that did not require daily, weekly or monthly dosing. The proportion of women believing themselves well informed about their contraception options ranged from 30% in Russia to 86% in the US. Informed women were generally more aware of alternative methods than their uninformed counterparts. Responses also varied significantly among women in different age groups.
Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that a range of factors influence a woman's choice of contraceptive. This highlights the importance of individualized counselling during contraceptive selection to ensure that the option recommended is tailored to the personal preferences of each woman to improve compliance, continuance and prevention of an unwanted pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Aug;45(397):409-14. Br J Gen Pract. 1995. PMID: 7576845 Free PMC article.
-
Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling.BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 28;13:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9. BMC Womens Health. 2013. PMID: 23448283 Free PMC article.
-
Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America.Reprod Health. 2013 Feb 5;10:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-7. Reprod Health. 2013. PMID: 23384291 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):69-76. Br J Fam Plann. 1999. PMID: 10454658 Review.
Cited by
-
Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey.BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0508-6. BMC Womens Health. 2018. PMID: 29347935 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with the contraindicated use of oral contraceptives in Brazil.Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jan 12;51(0):1. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006113. Rev Saude Publica. 2017. PMID: 28099550 Free PMC article.
-
Engineered drug delivery devices to address Global Health challenges.J Control Release. 2021 Mar 10;331:503-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.01.035. Epub 2021 Jan 28. J Control Release. 2021. PMID: 33516755 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of SMS reminders on PrEP adherence in young Kenyan women (MPYA study): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet HIV. 2021 Mar;8(3):e130-e137. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30307-6. Lancet HIV. 2021. PMID: 33662265 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
There might be blood: a scoping review on women's responses to contraceptive-induced menstrual bleeding changes.Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 26;15(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0561-0. Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 29940996 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous