Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures
- PMID: 20819139
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02145.x
Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures
Abstract
This study assessed the effect of simulated mastication on the retention of two stud attachment systems for 2-implants overdentures. Sixteen specimens, each simulating an edentulous ridge with implants and an overdenture were divided into two groups, according to the attachment system: Group I (Nobel Biocare ball-socket attachments) and Group II (Locator attachments). Retention forces were measured before and after 400,000 simulated masticatory loads in a customised device. Data were compared by two-way anova followed by Bonferroni test (α = 0·05). Group I presented significantly lower retention forces (Newtons) than Group II at baseline (10·6 ± 3·6 and 66·4 ± 16·0, respectively). However, differences were not significant after 400,000 loads (7·9 ± 4·3 and 21·6 ± 17·0). The number of cycles did not influence the measurements in Group I, whereas a non-linear descending curve was found for Group II. It was concluded that simulated mastication resulted in minor changes for the ball attachment tested. Nevertheless, it reduced the retention of Locator attachments to 40% of the baseline values, what suggests that mastication is a major factor associated with maintenance needs for this system.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.J Prosthodont. 2010 Dec;19(8):614-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00613.x. J Prosthodont. 2010. PMID: 20546492
-
Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 10. J Prosthet Dent. 2014. PMID: 24819528
-
Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.J Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;20(4):286-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00699.x. Epub 2011 May 3. J Prosthodont. 2011. PMID: 21539646
-
Digital wear analysis and retention of poly-ether-ether-ketone retentive inserts versus conventional nylon inserts in locator retained mandibular overdentures: in-vitro study.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 6;28(9):468. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05831-y. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39105859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Sep-Oct;22(5):429-40. Int J Prosthodont. 2009. PMID: 20095190 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of saliva pH value on the retention and durability of bar-clip attachments.J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Feb;7(1):32-8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.1.32. Epub 2015 Feb 17. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015. PMID: 25722835 Free PMC article.
-
Retentive force and dislodgment time variations between three implant overdenture stud attachments in an acidic environment: An in-vitro pilot study.Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.027. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Saudi Dent J. 2024. PMID: 38419987 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1-8 years of follow-up.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018 Jul 27;4(4):132-145. doi: 10.1002/cre2.122. eCollection 2018 Aug. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018. PMID: 30181910 Free PMC article.
-
Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;5(4):255-62. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.161752. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015. PMID: 26312224 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retentive Characteristics of a New Attachment System for Hybrid Dentures.Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 4;13(15):3434. doi: 10.3390/ma13153434. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32759744 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources