Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Sep;14(9):1169-75.

Evaluation of MGIT 960 and the colorimetric-based method for tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing

Affiliations
  • PMID: 20819264
Comparative Study

Evaluation of MGIT 960 and the colorimetric-based method for tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing

N Morcillo et al. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Setting: Dr Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina.

Objective: Evaluation of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system and the colorimetric-based method (CMM) for first- and second-line drug susceptibility testing (FL-DST, SL-DST) against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Design: FL-DST was studied using SIRE MGIT 960. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for isoniazid (INH), streptomycin, rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB) and levofloxacin (LVX) were also determined by CMM using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). MICs for amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KM), capreomycin (CPM), ethionamide (ETH), cycloserine, ofloxacin (OFX), linezolide (LZ) and moxifloxacin (MFX) were determined on 94 multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates by MGIT 960 and CMM. Statistical methods were applied to define drug-susceptible and drug-resistant isolates on the basis of the comparison between results obtained by gold standards.

Results: A total of 1626 clinical isolates were studied. Critical drug concentrations could be defined in less than 10 days for both CMM and MGIT 960. CMM was cheaper but more laborious than MGIT 960. The highest performances of both methods were achieved for AMK, RMP, OFX, LZ and MFX, followed by INH, ETH, KM, CPM and LVX (tested only by CMM).

Conclusions: Both methods could be implemented as rapid diagnostic tools to detect drug-resistant isolates in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources