Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):549-54.
doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004036.

Linguistic approach for identification of medication names and related information in clinical narratives

Affiliations

Linguistic approach for identification of medication names and related information in clinical narratives

Thierry Hamon et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Pharmacotherapy is an integral part of any medical care process and plays an important role in the medical history of most patients. Information on medication is crucial for several tasks such as pharmacovigilance, medical decision or biomedical research.

Objectives: Within a narrative text, medication-related information can be buried within other non-relevant data. Specific methods, such as those provided by text mining, must be designed for accessing them, and this is the objective of this study.

Methods: The authors designed a system for analyzing narrative clinical documents to extract from them medication occurrences and medication-related information. The system also attempts to deduce medications not covered by the dictionaries used.

Results: Results provided by the system were evaluated within the framework of the I2B2 NLP challenge held in 2009. The system achieved an F-measure of 0.78 and ranked 7th out of 20 participating teams (the highest F-measure was 0.86). The system provided good results for the annotation and extraction of medication names, their frequency, dosage and mode of administration (F-measure over 0.81), while information on duration and reasons is poorly annotated and extracted (F-measure 0.36 and 0.29, respectively). The performance of the system was stable between the training and test sets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
System architecture for the extraction of medication-related information and for establishing dependencies among the annotations. POS, part-of-speech.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO International drug monitoring: the role of national centers. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1972 - PubMed
    1. FDA Good pharmacovigilance practices and pharmacoepidemiologic assessement. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2005
    1. Pronovost P, Weast B, Schwarz M, et al. Medication reconciliation: a practical tool to reduce the risk of medication errors. J Crit Care 2003;18:201–5 - PubMed
    1. Bates D, Leape L, Cullen D, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998;280:1311–16 - PubMed
    1. Teich J, Merchia P, Schmiz J, et al. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2741–7 - PubMed

Substances